@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 months agotrainsmander.xyzimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1991arrow-down116
arrow-up1975arrow-down1imagetrainsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 months agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish13•8 months agoYou sure about those equations? My background in Physics tells me that 1= π = (speed of light) / (not quite speed of light) [without unit]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•edit-28 months agoIf the metre was 4.8% shorter then the speed of light could be π*108 m/s
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•8 months agoObviously the right thing to do is to make the meter shorter. Or invent degrees Kelvin.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•8 months agoIf physics taught you that 1 = pi, you may want to retake some classes.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•edit-28 months agoI don’t know, I passed the “rounding to the next order of magnitude because it’s good enough and nobody will notice” class with flying colours I got 1000%, or something close
1 = 1.00 = 100%
There is no doubt.
You sure about those equations? My background in Physics tells me that 1= π = (speed of light) / (not quite speed of light) [without unit]
If the metre was 4.8% shorter then the speed of light could be π*108 m/s
Obviously the right thing to do is to make the meter shorter. Or invent degrees Kelvin.
If physics taught you that 1 = pi, you may want to retake some classes.
I don’t know, I passed the “rounding to the next order of magnitude because it’s good enough and nobody will notice” class with flying colours
I got 1000%, or something close
π = 1 is fine in a Fermi approximation