• MxM111
    link
    fedilink
    -738 months ago

    Protesting, no. Disrupting, yes.
    Protesting civilian casualties, no. Supporting Hamas, yes.
    Supporting creation of Palestinian state - no. Supporting destruction of Israeli state (from the reaver to the sea) - yes.
    Unfortunately these protests attracts all kind of people, including those with antisemitism tendencies. So, it is not simple yes/no answer.

    • @stoly
      link
      52
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      People alway complain about disruption without somehow noticing that France has 30 hour work weeks, gobs of vacation, free health care, and free school. That came by being disruptive. The people of the United States can’t pull their heads out of their rectums long enough to make it stop being an unlivable shithole.

      • MxM111
        link
        fedilink
        -338 months ago

        Yeah, right, that’s because protests were disruptive, sure.

        • @stoly
          link
          168 months ago

          Yes. When all the farmers and workers block all the highways until the legislature listens, the people win. The US will never grow up enough to be able to do the people are too far spread out. It allows the police and other right-wing movers to crush things while people like you go “DURR look at them libruls”.

          • MxM111
            link
            fedilink
            -98 months ago

            This is not the only way and often it is less efficient way. Consider January 6, for example. Trump movement would be much better off it was just non-disruptive peaceful protest.

            • @stoly
              link
              78 months ago

              lol don’t do false equivalency. Demanding rights for the people is not the same as overthrowing a democracy

              • MxM111
                link
                fedilink
                08 months ago

                The goals are different, but the methods are the same as you advocate. I argue that one method is more acceptable than the other. Don’t be a hypocrite by saying that it is OK to disturb if you support the goal.

                • @stoly
                  link
                  1
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  You almost had an argument and then went to a personal attack

                  • MxM111
                    link
                    fedilink
                    18 months ago

                    That was not a personal attack. But what you stated is hypocrisy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          128 months ago

          It is. I’m sure you want protests so peaceful that you would never even notice they’re happening, therefore you’d never understand their cause, therefore never happening, therefore changing nothing.

          That’s what you want: No change. Ever. Especially if you’re ‘disruptive’ about it.

            • @stoly
              link
              38 months ago

              no, it’s unclear why we were mentioned here

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                58 months ago

                Until proven otherwise, I choose to believe it is because you are all members of Bohemian Grove together.

                • @stoly
                  link
                  38 months ago

                  I had to look that one up. Interesting reference.

            • linarphy
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              @WeirdGoesPro
              If you mean the one I mentionned no. I’m on pleroma and like mastodon, you have to tag someone so he/she can read the answer. In “big” thread like there are often on kbin/lemmy, the answer should be readable for everyone who participate in it, hence multiple tags. (I don’t have the habit to remove them)

      • MxM111
        link
        fedilink
        -248 months ago

        No, I welcome it. Disruptive protesting I am against though.

          • MxM111
            link
            fedilink
            -58 months ago

            So, you think that there are no such things as non-disruptive protests? What’s your point? Your statement looks smart but there is nothing behind it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              88 months ago

              Nondisruptive protest is basically an oxymoron. If a protest doesn’t take up space and get in the way of things then it is on the level of hanging a sign on your personal property.

              • MxM111
                link
                fedilink
                -28 months ago

                Most of the protests at White House and Capitol building are non-disruptive and follow the rules. But looks like you are supporting January 6 type of protests.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I wonder if I should be happy that lemmy has grown to be large enough for the IDF to consider it a legitimate target for propaganda, or just bummed out that nearly every single thread seems to be infected by this trash.