@Wilshire to News • 24 days agoJudge upholds $83m E Jean Carroll defamation verdict against Trumpwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square59arrow-up1637arrow-down16
arrow-up1631arrow-down1external-linkJudge upholds $83m E Jean Carroll defamation verdict against Trumpwww.theguardian.com@Wilshire to News • 24 days agomessage-square59
minus-square@stolylink14•24 days agoSCOTUS can take any case they want. But they don’t have all that much time so have to pick and choose until juicy ones.
minus-square@pdxfedlink6•24 days agoThe amount of faith you have in SCOTUS is concerning, they’ve already clearly demonstrated they’re not basing opinions on law but who appointed them.
minus-square@stolylink12•edit-224 days agoI have no faith in them. Ignoring them doesn’t fix things and pointing out how the world works does not imply faith.
SCOTUS can take any case they want. But they don’t have all that much time so have to pick and choose until juicy ones.
The amount of faith you have in SCOTUS is concerning, they’ve already clearly demonstrated they’re not basing opinions on law but who appointed them.
I have no faith in them. Ignoring them doesn’t fix things and pointing out how the world works does not imply faith.