Out of the half a million troops killed I wonder how many were actually Russians? Doesn’t look like things are working out for them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    898 months ago

    That number doesn’t mean KIA. That encompasses all casualties. So if you got arms and legs blown off and can no longer fight, you are lumped into that number. The KIA number is around 130-140k. Which is still a lot of people.

    • Flying SquidM
      link
      English
      358 months ago

      In context of the war, this number is more relevant. Dead or too injured to fight, fewer troops are fewer troops. It doesn’t really matter what percentage in that 466,150 number are still alive when it comes to Russia’s chances against the Ukrainian military.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        268 months ago

        Not disputing that. Just that OP labeled them all as killed. Any Russian sent home in a box or carried out on a litter is a win for democracy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        158 months ago

        Russia has more to spend. Ukraine doesn’t which is becoming more and more apparent. Luckily that US bill was approved. But still there will need to be some immense luck and enginuity for Ukraine not to fall. Not to mention for Europe to stop this common delusion, come together and form a modern and strong army to step behind Ukraine with long term support. Probably with soldiers as well.

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          English
          58 months ago

          How is having more money going to put more people on the ground?

          • Skua
            link
            fedilink
            108 months ago

            They meant Russia has more bodies to spend

          • @Deestan
            link
            English
            58 months ago

            If you can expend more artillery, you can use less soldiers.

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              English
              08 months ago

              You can’t capture a city with artillery.

              • @Deestan
                link
                English
                68 months ago

                No, that’d be weird. You use artillery and soldiers.

                The less soldiers you lose, the more you have left.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            When you have better tech, you need fewer soldiers. It’s the same with artillery as it is with drones.

      • @Chee_Koala
        link
        English
        58 months ago

        I do kind of feel good when i see aggressor troops fall/perish . At least that soldier can’t kill anymore defenders, so it’s like a +X ukrainian lives lootdrop that pop’s out of them. I’m not happy a human is now dead, but I am happy that there is one soldier less in poot poot’s army killing other people in their home country.

        • @copd
          link
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Cough Vietnam, cough Falklands, sniffle gulf war.

          Do you feel the same when it’s the “good guys” doing it?

          • @Chee_Koala
            link
            English
            58 months ago

            Sure! Aggressors can fuck right off :)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      If you loose an arm or a leg as a russian fighter, you are not gonna survive. Doubtful you will even be looked at twice. A wounded russian is a MIA russian. Russia is a cold place. Not just literally.