@return2ozma to World NewsEnglish • 9 months agoSaved from her dead mother's womb, baby Sabreen was laid to rest in a mournful and sometimes angry funeralwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square32arrow-up1114arrow-down121starcopymore-verticalflagCreate ReportslashBlock usercross-posted to: [email protected]news
arrow-up193arrow-down1external-linkSaved from her dead mother's womb, baby Sabreen was laid to rest in a mournful and sometimes angry funeralwww.nbcnews.com@return2ozma to World NewsEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square32starcopymore-verticalflagCreate ReportslashBlock usercross-posted to: [email protected]news
minus-square@squirrelwithnutlinkEnglish16•9 months agoNo, it’s not? arrow-up117arrow-down11file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-squaremechoman444linkEnglish-8•edit-29 months agoIt doesn’t actually say that the baby died. It says the baby was saved then there was an angry funeral for the very same dead baby they saved! In the same same breath they say the baby is alive and dead at the same time! Stop being intentionally contrary. The headline is confusing. arrow-up15arrow-down113file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-squareBZ 🇨🇦linkfedilinkEnglish10•9 months ago … was laid to rest … arrow-up110arrow-down10file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-square@Confused_EmuslinkEnglish7•9 months agohttps://www.hookedonphonics.com/ arrow-up18arrow-down11file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-squaremechoman444linkEnglish-4•9 months agoThe headline is confusing. And my English is better than yours. arrow-up12arrow-down16file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-square@Confused_EmuslinkEnglish3•9 months agoApparently not. The headline didn’t confuse me at all. arrow-up14arrow-down11file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-squaremechoman444linkEnglish-3•9 months agoIrrelevant. The headline is objectively confusing. In the same breath that says the baby is alive and dead and that there were angry people at a funeral. I rewrote the title in a way that isn’t confusing in my comments. Please check it out my. arrow-up11arrow-down14file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-square@Confused_EmuslinkEnglish3•9 months agoI think you need to review objective vs subjective. arrow-up13arrow-down10file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
No, it’s not?
It doesn’t actually say that the baby died. It says the baby was saved then there was an angry funeral for the very same dead baby they saved!
In the same same breath they say the baby is alive and dead at the same time!
Stop being intentionally contrary. The headline is confusing.
https://www.hookedonphonics.com/
The headline is confusing. And my English is better than yours.
Apparently not. The headline didn’t confuse me at all.
Irrelevant. The headline is objectively confusing. In the same breath that says the baby is alive and dead and that there were angry people at a funeral.
I rewrote the title in a way that isn’t confusing in my comments. Please check it out my.
I think you need to review objective vs subjective.