• mechoman444
    link
    English
    -117 months ago

    I read the article. That’s not in question. It’s just the head line is so confusing.

      • mechoman444
        link
        English
        -8
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It doesn’t actually say that the baby died. It says the baby was saved then there was an angry funeral for the very same dead baby they saved!

        In the same same breath they say the baby is alive and dead at the same time!

        Stop being intentionally contrary. The headline is confusing.

          • mechoman444
            link
            English
            -47 months ago

            The headline is confusing. And my English is better than yours.

            • @Confused_Emus
              link
              English
              37 months ago

              Apparently not. The headline didn’t confuse me at all.

              • mechoman444
                link
                English
                -37 months ago

                Irrelevant. The headline is objectively confusing. In the same breath that says the baby is alive and dead and that there were angry people at a funeral.

                I rewrote the title in a way that isn’t confusing in my comments. Please check it out my.

                • @Confused_Emus
                  link
                  English
                  37 months ago

                  I think you need to review objective vs subjective.

    • Victor
      link
      English
      77 months ago

      I didn’t have any trouble. Unfortunately. It was heartbreaking to read.