• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Fuck if I know, do you know how long the process typically takes? I certainly don’t. I was googling this while walking the dog, I’m no expert.

    I work as a government contractor and from my experience things can be held up by the silliest little things, and processes take a lot of time.

    When the recent XZ security exploit, everyone was all worried about it nearly making it’s way into Debian, a popular flavor of Linux, and at work we just laughed and said that means we’d have to worry about it it in 10 years because we’re that slow.

    • @p5yk0t1km1r4ge
      link
      -1
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Well then, yeah, I’d say it’d earn them a little grace, and I appreciate you actually talking about it instead of going down the “uR uH rUsSiAn TrOlL111one!” path. I still think it’s convenient timing, but it’s nice to see this was at least set into motion awhile back.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Yeah, an argument could be made that 2022 was a Senate election year, and this was fueled by that, but at that point we’re invalidating 2/4 years a president has to make changes.

        On top of this, I wouldn’t be surprised by the first year being slow as they get situated, meaning year 3 is the only year that “sincere” change can be expected to be made, which is kind of…harsh. I’d hate for my accomplishments to only count 25% of the time.

        I also really appreciate the discourse - I hope you have a great day.

        • @p5yk0t1km1r4ge
          link
          122 days ago

          Now that I think about it, didn’t Biden come into a locked GOP senate? I suppose it could be possible they were making it difficult as well maybe? Anyhow yeah, same. Thanks for the engaging conversation choom.