@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agoOur bffsmander.xyzimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1302arrow-down17
arrow-up1295arrow-down1imageOur bffsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squarePatapon EnjoyerlinkEnglish33•edit-21 month agoStatistitians are good people, though I need more data points to say anything conclusively
minus-square@marcoslinkEnglish6•1 month agoJust to point out, but you need to make sure your data is unbiased much more than you need a lot of points.
minus-square@merari42linkEnglish4•1 month agoCan you at least say how your prior belief distribution has shifted or been reaffirmed given the observed data points?
Statistitians are good people, though I need more data points to say anything conclusively
Just to point out, but you need to make sure your data is unbiased much more than you need a lot of points.
Can you at least say how your prior belief distribution has shifted or been reaffirmed given the observed data points?
That would be pretty Bayesed