@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 7 months agoneptunemander.xyzimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1593arrow-down16
arrow-up1587arrow-down1imageneptunemander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 7 months agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish47•7 months agothere are many things besides pixel count. i bet it was a hell of a 0.6mp camera to be able to snap that good of a pic of a planet literally in the middle of space
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•7 months agoProbably a very good lens. If there’s no digital zoom and little digital correction, then quality can be quite good despite low pixel count. Anti Commercial-AI license
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•7 months agoPhotography advice threads: “zoom with your feet!” Scientists: “…ok.”
there are many things besides pixel count.
i bet it was a hell of a 0.6mp camera to be able to snap that good of a pic of a planet literally in the middle of space
Probably a very good lens. If there’s no digital zoom and little digital correction, then quality can be quite good despite low pixel count.
Anti Commercial-AI license
Photography advice threads: “zoom with your feet!”
Scientists: “…ok.”