• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6910 months ago

    Not as bad as choosing not to use lidar for their automated driving, but pretty close.

    • @_sideffect
      link
      English
      5010 months ago

      Well, to remove LiDAR, as it was in place at first

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 months ago

            It’s just… incredibly dumb. Because the problem is not the optics. The problem is making a control system that more or less replicates a “normal” human response pattern, but then got regulated and litigated to hell and back, plus some helpful navigation suggestions based on correlation of user location data to advertising partners in partner-defined geographic and social media and demographic targeting nets, plus the fucking legion of weird edge case bugs that have probably crept in at some point in the process.

            At the same time, every once in a while, one should pause and consider how important it is to always look on the bright side of life

      • Tar_Alcaran
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1010 months ago

        But we don’t need LIDAR! Humans don’t have lidar, and they can drive! All you need to do is replicate millions of years of evolution in a few years and you’re done!

    • @slaacaa
      link
      English
      710 months ago

      TIL, what a joke. Based on a quick search it was merely cost cutting, they are idiots