• @PugJesus
      link
      English
      437 months ago

      Because in 2020 not enough Democrats voted for the better candidate.

    • stebo
      link
      fedilink
      217 months ago

      because first past the post voting socks

    • Cowbee [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Because who you can vote for is controlled by wealthy people and corporations that lobby the dominant parties, because the only way to amass that much support to run a campaign is through the Democrats or Republicans. You can’t vote for who you want, you must always pick the lesser of two evils.

      America has never really had proper democracy at the federal level if you can’t vote third party, realistically.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
            link
            fedilink
            57 months ago

            Found the white leftist.

            Moghafil, you don’t get to use my people’s plight as an excuse to get out of your bare minimum duty to protect lives with your choices.

            • @nature_man
              link
              14
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              This is so much more than just a race issue, its also an LGBTQ and neurodivergence issue, while I may not like Biden, Trump and his crew have both said things and acted in ways that attack basically anyone that isn’t in the in group they deem as worthwhile, republicans have also been pushing forward increasingly hostile anti-trans, anti-abortion laws, and Trump as president would bolster their ability to harm vulnerable groups even more

              I really hate Biden’s unquestioning support of Israel but holy fuck under Trump some of my friends might actually die, and others will lose their rights to be themselves!

              Lets also not forget Trump and his fans pushing for things that could very well spell the actual end of democracy in the US.

              Edit: I didn’t mean to subtract from the race issue, that’s also a big part of it, I simply mean to say that Trump is a massive broad spectrum threat to multiple vulnerable groups across the US

              Also edited because apparently this isn’t readily apparent to some people: under Trump, the genocide of Palestinians will continue, I am very very much against this, the “holy fuck” line is not expressing that I think the genocide of Palestinians is secondary, but is expressing exasperation at the people who constantly insist that the only way to protest is to not vote not seeing the problem with Trump getting into power

              While I’m at it, pretty much whatever the results of the election are, shit will probably hit the fan, I urge everyone to learn first aid, a good start is www.stopthebleed.org

              • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
                link
                fedilink
                147 months ago

                And by not voting for him, you’re voting for the guy who gave Netenyahu the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights.

                I know damn well who Netenyahu would be voting for if he got the choice, and that’s all you need to know too if you aren’t just a bougeyvik fascist.

                • @Cryophilia
                  link
                  97 months ago

                  And by not voting for him, you’re voting for the guy who gave Netenyahu the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights.

                  Not to mention the guy who ALSO will block the ICC from prosecuting Netanyahu.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -117 months ago

                  And by not voting for him, you’re voting for the guy who

                  Not how voting works

                  I know damn well who Netenyahu would be voting for if he got the choice

                  probably the guy blocking the International Criminal Court from prosecuting him for documented war crimes

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    57 months ago

                    Out of curiosity, let’s say someone wants to make the best possible decision for Palestinians. Meaning using their vote to produce the best possible outcome for Palestinians.

                    Who should they be voting for? How would it impact the situation? Why would that be the best? What is the risk assessment? In other words, how likely is successful, how good is success and how damaging is failure?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        You’ve got your head on straight. Screw these attempts to guilt you into voting how someone else wants you to

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        107 months ago

        Do you think a political party that actively and willfully prepares an opponent for the current elected head of state that belongs to their party could survive for any length of time?

        Of course, it’s worse than that. They clearly want Harris 2028.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -47 months ago

          Competitive primaries are a feature of any organization democratic enough (in the philosophical sense, not the “Democratic Party” sense). As long as you don’t actively fight for the leadership of the Democratic Party, they are going to continue screwing you and ignore any political demand that isn’t timid enough. Just my two cents as an European.

        • @Cryophilia
          link
          -117 months ago

          You people always let the mask slip when you mention Harris. You just can’t stand a Black woman being that close to the Presidency.

          • @stepan
            link
            107 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • @Cryophilia
              link
              -97 months ago

              They always could argue against Harris. She’s got some pretty big skeletons in her closet. But they never do. It’s always

              “Wait, why is Harris bad?”

              “Oh, you know

              Or you get the vague “unlikeable” stuff. They don’t know a damn thing about Harris, but they hate her guts with a passion anyways.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            47 months ago

            I can’t stand my party running a tough on crime prosecutor. Harris is an awful pick for high office and her unremarkable term as VP speaks volumes about how many policy decisions she genuinely has strong feelings about. She’s milquetoast, uninspiring, and would likely cost us another election.

            Fuck off with assuming that everyone who disagrees with you does so simply because of gender or race.