• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17 months ago

    Yes, they earned things. Fraudulently. You’re getting up in arms over some terminology that doesn’t quite mesh with your preferences. We’re clearly on the same wavelength - stop organizations from acquiring (does that keep you happy? Getting? Taking? Whatever fucking word you want) money through illegal or unethical methodology.

    You’re like the worst part of the left. Up in arms because someone dares to have a “different” opinion from you, when if you actually stopped to understand the words they’re saying, you’d realize you’re on the same fucking page.

    • @Wooki
      link
      0
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You’re perpetuating it as a win. Its not. Its not close to bare minimum. The cost of this should have been:

      1. Sales refunds
      2. Fine (much larger because its to small and because they are flying lose with personal safety)
      3. Damages to customers. It would be safe to assumed every person was placed in harms way that purchased these devices.

      Incoherent ramblings.

      Cool story bro

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Don’t put words in my mouth. You’re the one refusing to move past the fact that I chose to refer to your idea of a refund as part of the fine. Get back to me when you make an effort to understand the actual points I’m making. Actually, don’t bother, you’re not worth my time any longer.

        • @Wooki
          link
          17 months ago

          incoherent ramblings

          Still no coherent point.