• Aatube
    link
    fedilink
    48 months ago

    I intended to make it more like a cautionary tale. QAnon can happen to the best of us, and seedy thoughts that still consider that it was an illness for a while are sort of an entry point to the thought pattern behind conspiracy theories. If one builds tolerance to this kind of leap, it’ll be easier to build tolerance for much bigger leaps.

    • @TrickDacy
      link
      English
      18 months ago

      QAnon can happen to the best of us,

      I don’t agree. It happens to vulnerable people. And it’s not like a disease you can catch if you’re not vigilant. There are many steps to becoming bat shit, and wondering if a specific corporation would kill a person isn’t something I’m willing to avoid because next thing I know I’d be trying to hang the vice president.

      • Aatube
        link
        fedilink
        48 months ago

        Everyone is vulnerable in one way or another. Of course, wondering is natural, but seriously accepting it, as some in this thread have done, is a QAnon kind of leap.

        • @TrickDacy
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          some

          Technically accurate that some have done that, but an exaggeration to consider it a trend

          • Aatube
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            Well, there only has to be a strong possibility to warn against it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        wondering if a specific corporation would kill a person

        You have to realize how your first post came off. The poster you responded to clearly was talking about the people claiming Boeing did it. Of which there are plenty of this thread.

        You then jumped in and said this wasn’t conspiracy nonsense, but the result of “obvious deductive powers.”

        This did not come off as merely “wondering” or considering it a possibility, but as if you were saying it was an obvious fact.

        I’m not even sure how to interpret that comment in relation to what you’re saying now.

        • @TrickDacy
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          What I remember seeing was people making implications and jokes. People don’t always mean things 100% literally. I doubt there are all that many people totally convinced it was Boeing, but some of you are acting like that is the case. I disagree, that is all

          Ps deductive reasoning doesn’t mean “I know it for a fact”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            08 months ago

            If my kid goes into the kitchen, and I go in a little while later and see the cookies are gone, i’m going to believe they ate them. Am I 100% convinced of it? No. Maybe i just didn’t realize they had been eaten earlier, or maybe someone snuck in the back and ate them. But I’m relatively convinced they ate the.

            I’m sure there are very few people, at most, that are convince 100% that Boeing did it. But it’s very presumptuous to assume that all of the people in this thread claiming Boeing did it are just joking. Seems more reasonable to take their statements at face value and understand that they do think Boeing did it, or at least someone related to boeing did it.

            But I’m not sure what this has to do with what was suggested by your initial post.

            Ps deductive reasoning doesn’t mean “I know it for a fact”

            By definition deductive reason is using logic to come to a specific conclusion, so it absolutely does mean it’s a fact.

            • @TrickDacy
              link
              English
              18 months ago

              Deductive reasoning means using evidence so no you’re flat wrong. Also, ever heard of a “knee jerk reaction”? Hint, that also isn’t a term that means you’re sure of anything

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                08 months ago

                You’re confusing deductive reasoning with inductive reasoning. But I wouldn’t even call it inductive reasoning, as it’s really just an empty hypothesis where people are putting what they want to be the truth into the holes of our knowledge…or hell even outright rejecting evidence, like qanons do.

                And, again, Ive already agreed that they don’t 100% believe it. But arguing that they don’t think Boeing had this person killed is just ignoring what they said and assuming what you want.

                • @TrickDacy
                  link
                  English
                  18 months ago

                  This conversation started with some people cheekily blaming Boeing (a fair first reaction). Then some dude chided everyone for being like qanon, I said that was a deep over exaggeration, now here I am getting a lesson in pedantry. What even are conversations like this?

                  I read the thread one way and a couple others didn’t. End of story.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    08 months ago

                    "oh, sorry. I was mistaken about what deductive reasoning means, and I can see why what I said did not convey what I actually think. Thanks for the correction.’