I’m super against abuses in scales but this one isn’t that bad. It wouldn’t have changed too much but yes, it’s slightly deceptive to track it as what looks like 10x the growth instead of 5
It’s half way up a line at the start of the graph, and the end of the graph is at 8 lines tall, so by my math I’d say it looks like 16x vs roughly the actual ~4x improvement.
The graph not starting at 0 makes this a bit deceiving at first glance.
I’m super against abuses in scales but this one isn’t that bad. It wouldn’t have changed too much but yes, it’s slightly deceptive to track it as what looks like 10x the growth instead of 5
It’s half way up a line at the start of the graph, and the end of the graph is at 8 lines tall, so by my math I’d say it looks like 16x vs roughly the actual ~4x improvement.
I almost said 15 actually but figured 10 would be fine :)
Thanks for the more structured approach to my baseless guess