• @0Empty0
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    That’s interesting. So what would the appropriate response for Meta be when they are officially served a warrant?

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      English
      261 year ago

      It shouldn’t be possible for Meta to hand over the data. There should be a wall of privacy between Meta and its users private messages. The company I work for doesn’t even have access to customer accounts without the customer’s permission.

      • @0Empty0
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        I appreciate you actually answering the question instead of just being a fucking douche

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          Hey, this isn’t Reddit. I don’t want it to be. It was a fine question.

      • @DocMcStuffin
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Technically, unless that data is encrypted with only the end user having access to the key or is being held/mediated by a third party, they do have access. It’s only company policy that’s preventing access, and a court can shred that policy with a court order on a case by case basis. Same goes for the third party. The end user has to be the only one with the key.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        It’s because Signal is end to end encrypted. Same is true for WhatsApp and that’s a Meta product, they can’t hand over messages even if they wanted to.

        Messenger is adding E2EE as well.

    • BarqsHasBite
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 year ago

      About that data I’m not sure, but I’d immediately stop collecting it.

      • @Schmedes
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        They would need to remove a lot of features for that to work.