• neuropean
    link
    fedilink
    95 months ago

    Does that mean he could have taken shots if he posted a no trespassing sign?

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      75 months ago

      apparently not. I looked it up out of curiosity:

      the requirements for lethal force:

      • Person not engaged in unlawful activity;
      • Person in a place they have a legal right to be;
      • Reasonable belief of imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury;
      • The danger creating the belief of imminent death or serious bodily injury is real, or honestly believed to be real at the time;
      • The belief is founded on reasonable grounds.

      this would fail the last one.

    • @PoliticalAgitator
      link
      5
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      He can shoot at people because he was sold a gun and anyone who has a gun can shoot at anybody they decide. What we’re actually waiting to learn is “Will this former responsible gun owner get away with shooting at people?”.

      If the answer is “yes” then other gun owners are going to do the same thing because they want to shoot at people.

      If the answer is “no because he didn’t have a ‘no trespassing’ sign” then gun owners are going to buy “no trespassing” signs and then shoot at people, because they want to shoot at people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      I don’t think a good-faith misdelivery is trespassing, so no. Unless you want any delivery to be done by throwing the box from the curb.