• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    189 months ago

    Once again, the problem is that the banks aren’t being taxed. The reason the billionaires don’t pay taxes is that they buy everything with money they borrow from the banks.

    • RubberDuck
      link
      199 months ago

      Borrowing against assets should be income that cannot be offset by the debt.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        29 months ago

        The problem is more that one person can control billions in assets, particularly when the staff that generates the revenue that gives these assets value are in poverty.

        • RubberDuck
          link
          30
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Good point… it might have come across like that… but that is for sure not what I meant.

          A home is already taxed. An asset portfolio like stock only when realized. Borrowing against it should count as realizing the gains.

          Or maybe better yet, we tax the whole portfolio like we do real estate against the value at the measuring point. Cause a portfolio is either something because it is used as collateral and thus taxed… or it’s nothing and cannot be borrowed against without realizing the gains.

          • @StuffYouFear
            link
            139 months ago

            Sir, this is the internet. Well explained and reasonable responses are not welcome here.

            • RubberDuck
              link
              59 months ago

              Ha! Jokes on you… I’m actually a cat masqueradeing as a person.

        • @InternetCitizen2
          link
          29 months ago

          Interesting, but if we did a lot of what the billionaire do suddenly the spirit of the law might be more important than the letter.