@[email protected] to TechnologyEnglish • 7 months agoStack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership — users banned for deleting answers to prevent them being used to train ChatGPTwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square458fedilinkarrow-up11.73Karrow-down113cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.72Karrow-down1external-linkStack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership — users banned for deleting answers to prevent them being used to train ChatGPTwww.tomshardware.com@[email protected] to TechnologyEnglish • 7 months agomessage-square458fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@RolandolinkEnglish18•7 months agoI’m not sure about that… in Europe don’t you have the right to insist that a website no longer use your content?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•7 months agoNot when you’ve agreed to a terms of service that hands over ownership of your content to Stack Overflow, leaving you merely licensed to use your own content.
minus-squareVenia SilentelinkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoBets are strong such tos are not legally enforceable.
minus-square@Z3k3linkEnglish0•7 months agoThat’s an interesting point. I winder how llms handle gdpr would it be like having a tiny piece of your brain cut out
I’m not sure about that… in Europe don’t you have the right to insist that a website no longer use your content?
Not when you’ve agreed to a terms of service that hands over ownership of your content to Stack Overflow, leaving you merely licensed to use your own content.
Bets are strong such tos are not legally enforceable.
That’s an interesting point. I winder how llms handle gdpr would it be like having a tiny piece of your brain cut out