• Move to lemm.eeBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Claiming Tito was not a communist is getting kinda weird given the party was called the League of Communists of Yugoslavia

    • jerdle_lemmy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m personally closer to social democracy, but relatively on the left of that area, towards market socialism.

        • jerdle_lemmy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Because I prefer my ideology with less authoritarianism. SWCC is borderline fascist.

          • Move to lemm.eeBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 years ago

            SWCC is borderline fascist.

            Why do you say that? The electoral structure is almost identical to Cuba, although significantly larger in scale (due to obvious population differences), both systems were derivative of the USSR’s system.

            What unique structural feature makes you call one fascist over the other? I at least assume you don’t consider Cuba fascist. And what exactly is your take on the USSR? You are aware that the electoral system of Yugoslavia under Tito was also extremely similar right? I mention this since you implied you were fond of titoism.