• Move to lemm.ee
    link
    English
    92 years ago

    Claiming Tito was not a communist is getting kinda weird given the party was called the League of Communists of Yugoslavia

    • @jerdle_lemmy
      link
      English
      12 years ago

      I’m personally closer to social democracy, but relatively on the left of that area, towards market socialism.

      • Move to lemm.ee
        link
        English
        42 years ago

        Why Tito’s market socialism and not SWCC then?

        • @jerdle_lemmy
          link
          English
          02 years ago

          Because I prefer my ideology with less authoritarianism. SWCC is borderline fascist.

          • Move to lemm.ee
            link
            English
            52 years ago

            SWCC is borderline fascist.

            Why do you say that? The electoral structure is almost identical to Cuba, although significantly larger in scale (due to obvious population differences), both systems were derivative of the USSR’s system.

            What unique structural feature makes you call one fascist over the other? I at least assume you don’t consider Cuba fascist. And what exactly is your take on the USSR? You are aware that the electoral system of Yugoslavia under Tito was also extremely similar right? I mention this since you implied you were fond of titoism.