• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -17 months ago

    If they claim it’s proof without there being proof, it’s a bad faith statement. It’s not pedantic to call it out just because you disagree with it.

    It’s disingenuous to take credit for something where no credit was ever given.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      What’s actually bad faith is knowing what someone meant, but continuing to argue that a single word choice voids their sentiment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -17 months ago

        No. The onus isn’t on me to “know what they meant.” That’s how misunderstanding happens. The responsibility lies in what you say and how you say it.

        If you claim something is proof of something, be prepared to prove it when asked, or don’t say it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          The onus isn’t on me to “know what they meant.”

          Of course not. And even if you want to pretend you were actually unclear on it, it was then explained to you several times. So whether or not its on you to know it is irrelevant. You did know it, and chose to continue your argument in bad faith from there on out.

          If you claim something is proof of something, be prepared to prove it when asked, or don’t say it.

          So change the word “proof” in the parent comment to “strong evidence”. Is it clear to you now? Do you understand?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -17 months ago

            Okay man. I’m really fucking tired of you people constantly rearranging my comments to fit your shitty little narrative.

            I’m blocking you as well as the others.

            Learn what nuance is.