• @Aux
    link
    English
    07 months ago

    A SO alternative cannot exist if a user who posted an answer owns it. That defeats the purpose of sharing your knowledge and answering questions as it would mean the person asking the question cannot use your answer.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      A SO alternative cannot exist if a user who posted an answer owns it. That defeats the purpose of sharing your knowledge and answering questions as it would mean the person asking the question cannot use your answer.

      Couldn’t these owners dictate how their creations are used? If you don’t own it, you don’t even get a say.

      • @Aux
        link
        English
        -17 months ago

        That’s the point of platforms like SO - you give away your knowledge, for free, for everyone, for any use case. If a user can restrict the use of their answers, then it makes no sense for SO to exist. It’s like donating food to a food bank and saying that your food should only go to white people and not black people.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          I’m not sure I agree with your example - it’s more like giving the owners of the donation the ability to choose WHO they are donating to. That means choosing not to donate to companies that might take your food donation and sell it as damaged goods for example. I wouldn’t want my donation to be used that way. Thats how I see it anyway