• @OccamsTeapot
    link
    English
    218 months ago

    Palestinians’ tactic of “existing and deserving rights” is paying off, yeah.

    Human shields are kind of useless against an army with no morals ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
      link
      English
      -18
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      If they want more rights that begins with following International law on any occasions. Rejecting terrorism. Putting your soldiers in uniform. Freeing hostages. Not targeting innocent people every single day with indiscriminate rocket attacks. Do you know anything about the people you’re talking about or are you just ignoring it all because you’re sad about the consequences of their own actions? Nobody made Hamas build tunnels under every single school and hospital, nobody made Hamas turn their airport and water ports into instrumentalities of international terrorism. That’s what the people chose. Hamas is (was?) wildly popular.

      • @OccamsTeapot
        link
        English
        148 months ago

        If they want more rights that begins with following International law on any occasions. Rejecting terrorism. Putting your soldiers in uniform. Freeing hostages. Not targeting innocent people every single day with indiscriminate rocket attacks.

        Apart from the fact that they do have uniforms for soldiers (except for during that little hospital “operation” some months back), you see that Israel is guilty of all of this too, right?

        Eg being held in “administrative detention” without charge is being held hostage, harming or threatening innocent civilians so they put pressure on their government is terrorism. Killing AI-identified “targets” while they’re at home with their families because it’s easier is targeting innocent people every day. And withholding the necessities of life from civilians on purpose is against international law. Nice uniforms though yeah.

        Should we take away Israelis’ rights by your logic? Or should we not punish innocents for the actions of people who claim to speak for them?

        Basic rights are not conditional. Not sure how I can explain that to you if you don’t understand that already. Jesus christ.

          • @OccamsTeapot
            link
            English
            98 months ago

            Like you totally ignored all points of fact raised by me and didn’t even know that Israel detains Palestinians without charge all the time outside of active war?

            I’ll tell you why I didn’t fight you on these points: the topic of conversation is Palestinian statehood. NOT Hamas. What you are doing is classic hasbara bullshit, if in doubt and people start talking about human rights for Palestinians, shift the conversation to Hamas. You think or at least imply that the actions of a few can detract from the need for basic rights for every single human being. As I said, if that was the case then Israelis lose them too.

            And guess what? Hamas are terrorists and I agree they are shit. Now if you could face up to the various despicable crimes of Israel we might actually get somewhere here.

            • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
              link
              English
              -2
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Listen I can totally face up to the war crimes. There have been many. The side that actually punishes war crimes is redeemable. The side that rewards war crimes is not.

              I understand that in Israel there is a political movement that fosters a culture of wiping things under the rug or maybe pardoning war criminals like Trump did and would do again in America. But every dead kid in Gaza rests squarely at the feet of Hamas. Seems like it’s about 3% of the population that is so hardcore for Hamas that they are ready to die for the cause with their loved ones in tow.

              • @OccamsTeapot
                link
                English
                3
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Listen I can totally face up to the war crimes. There have been many.

                Thank you. This is very bad and I’m sure you can see that not all have been punished, in fact I think the WCK attack is one of the only ones recently that have?

                But Israel is still allowed at the UN. They should be in the UN despite all of the (IMO) horrendous things that the country is doing and has done. Since Hamas would not be the representatives of Palestine at the UN (so complaining about them is not relevant), why should Palestine not have full UN membership? Why do they not deserve a proper seat at the table?

                It would be like saying Israel doesn’t deserve membership because settlers are terrorists and the IDF and the current government supports them. I don’t understand how you can apply the logic to Hamas and Palestine but not there?

                If you answer nothing else, please answer this: do you think that the state of Palestine has the right to exist?

                • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
                  link
                  English
                  -28 months ago

                  Sure, in the West Bank. Gaza is forfeit. It’s a collapsed state, lawless, unincorporated territory, irredenta, free to whoever can establish order.

                  Even from just a physical standpoint, the very foundation of Gaza’s cities and towns were turned to Swiss cheese by Hamas. Nothing is stable. Gaza has zero capability or capacity to rebuild itself and literally nobody else cares enough about Gaza to do it other than Israel. Qatar only sends money if Hamas is fielding soldiers to kill Jews, the West only sends money if Hamas tricks enough human shields into being “martyred.”

                  • @OccamsTeapot
                    link
                    English
                    38 months ago

                    Gaza is not forfeit, it can be rebuilt. But anyway, if you agree to a state in the West Bank, then you should have no problem with Palestine having full UN membership, right?

                    the West only sends money if Hamas tricks enough human shields into being “martyred.”

                    This comes across dehumanizing and frankly, disgusting. They are not “shields” by living in their fucking houses. They didn’t build the tunnels did they? Why should they die because of them?

          • @OccamsTeapot
            link
            English
            68 months ago

            I’m not talking about prisoners of war anywhere there.

            • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
              link
              English
              -58 months ago

              Prisoners taken in a warzone under suspicion. Administrative detention. Call it however. No diplomatic status. Citizens of no legitimate state. Hamas is a terrorist organization. They don’t get to have a state. They are actual war criminals for all intents and purposes, and in all pursuits. War crimes are never punished in Gaza, often rewarded, always revered. Hamas is indefensible and unredeemable for what they’ve done to millions of people of have lived and died in Gaza without any prospects, having turned every institution into modalities of Iranian-vassal terrorism. Give me a break.

              • @OccamsTeapot
                link
                English
                58 months ago

                Prisoners taken in a warzone under suspicion. Administrative detention. Call it however.

                Here you go, something fun to learn: https://www.btselem.org/administrative_detention

                Again, nothing to do with war, NOT prisoners of war. Hostages by another name. How did you not know about this?

                They are actual war criminals for all intents and purposes, and in all pursuits. War crimes are never punished in Gaza Israel, often rewarded, always revered.

                Also true this way around. Israel has been committing war crimes for 7 months straight now.

                • @rdri
                  link
                  English
                  -18 months ago

                  Israel has been committing war crimes for 7 months straight now.

                  Why only 7 months and not more? Did something change Israel’s intentions to spend more time on commiting war crimes?

                  I could say hamas has been commiting war crimes for years now. Would that be wrong?

                  • @OccamsTeapot
                    link
                    English
                    48 months ago

                    Why only 7 months and not more? Did something change Israel’s intentions to spend more time on commiting war crimes?

                    Yeah I mean we can keep going back if you like, but I was just talking about the current war, obviously.

                    I could say hamas has been commiting war crimes for years now. Would that be wrong?

                    It would be totally right. Why stop there? They have not allowed a free and fair election since they were voted in. They are tyrants.

                • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
                  link
                  English
                  -2
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Go read the ICJ preliminary order and the express finding that Israel does prosecute war criminals. And guess what? It’s true. The Qatari state/ pro-Trump/pro-Russia media diet you are gorging yourself on does not cover it at all.

                  Hamas are war criminals…in all pursuits.

                  No, that’s not also true about Israel. You are looking at a small isolated thing, which I think you are portraying unfairly and incompletely, but fine we can disagree.

                  But Israel has a legitimate government that has stabily for decades provided essential services to tens of millions of people.

                  Glad you agree Hamas must go.

                  What’s your plan to make that happen? How would you destroy the tunnels?

                  You’d do the best you could. That means ordinance and coordinated evacuations and warnings, knowing that the civilian population is going to follow Hamas around up above like one of those artic foxes stalking a tundra shrew below the snow, so they can win Martyrdom™ prizes, paid in rial, no doubt. Such disregard for their own side’s civilians is unprecedented in warfare. International law is based on precedent.

                  • @OccamsTeapot
                    link
                    English
                    38 months ago

                    Sorry did you just totally ignore the administrative detention thing? We can talk about this stuff afterwards. Do you see how these people are hostages?