@[email protected] to [email protected] • 8 months agoMonopolysh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up11.59Karrow-down121
arrow-up11.57Karrow-down1imageMonopolysh.itjust.works@[email protected] to [email protected] • 8 months agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-square@gruelinkEnglish1•7 months agoThat’s a good point, and made me wonder if the Georgist who made the original would have been silly enough to include it. Answer: nope, of course she knew better. In the original, that square is labeled “poorhouse”/“public park” (not “-ing”) instead.
That’s a good point, and made me wonder if the Georgist who made the original would have been silly enough to include it.
Answer: nope, of course she knew better. In the original, that square is labeled “poorhouse”/“public park” (not “-ing”) instead.