The complaint looks like a serious stretch. The one bit where I have some sympathy, is about false attributions to the NYT. (IMHO) MS and OAI should emphasize the limitations of the chat AIs far more. It can’t be taken as a given that everyone knows that they make stuff up.

Direct link to the complaint:

https://nytco-assets.nytimes.com/2023/12/NYT_Complaint_Dec2023.pdf

This is the best summary I could come up with:

The New York Times is suing OpenAI and Microsoft over claims the companies built their AI models by “copying and using millions” of the publication’s articles and now “directly compete” with the outlet’s content.

As outlined in the lawsuit, the Times alleges OpenAI and Microsoft’s large language models (LLMs), which power ChatGPT and Copilot, “can generate output that recites Times content verbatim, closely summarizes it, and mimics its expressive style.” This “undermine[s] and damage[s]” the Times’ relationship with readers, the outlet alleges, while also depriving it of “subscription, licensing, advertising, and affiliate revenue.”

Meanwhile, the lawsuit states the release of AI models trained on the Times’ content has proven “extremely lucrative” for both Microsoft and OpenAI.

The publication claims it has attempted to negotiate with both companies for months to “ensure it received fair value for the use of its content,” but failed to reach a solution.

The New York Times is suing both companies for copyright infringement and asks them to be held liable for “billions of dollars in statutory and actual damages” for allegedly copying its works.

“Through Microsoft’s Bing Chat (recently rebranded as “Copilot”) and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Defendants seek to free-ride on The Times’s massive investment in its journalism by using it to build substitutive products without permission or payment,” the lawsuit states.

The original article contains 251 words, the summary contains 216 words. Saved 14%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!