The Beijing institute developed the technique to crack an iPhone’s encrypted device log to identify the numbers and emails of senders who share AirDrop content, the city’s judicial bureau said in an online post. Police have identified multiple suspects via that method, the agency said, without disclosing if anyone was arrested. “It improves the efficiency and accuracy of case-solving and prevents the spread of inappropriate remarks as well as potential bad influences,” the bureau said.

Further read: https://sfj.beijing.gov.cn/sfj/sfdt/ywdt82/flfw93/436331732/index.html

  • @WhatsThePoint
    link
    English
    118
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Or China is just saying they cracked Air Drop to try to scare protestors from using this feature. If they cracked it, why would they make it public that they cracked it when they could catch dissidents using it without their knowledge? Not to mention making it public puts pressure on Apple to patch it, which would destroy their access. Doesn’t make much sense to make this public if it is true.

    • Dr. Dabbles
      link
      English
      10111 months ago

      Whenever a government or government agency announces a successful exploit, I presume they’ve already exhausted it and moved on to another one that won’t be patched or publicly divulged for many years.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          511 months ago

          You can still have more certainty or less. If it’s open-source - it doesn’t guarantee safety by any means, sure, but if it’s proprietary like this one - you don’t even get a chance to check what’s going on.

        • idunnololz
          link
          211 months ago

          Just make a machine to prove it /s

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Nothing is ever completely secure if it’s connected to the internet. It just likely isn’t worth it to hack into. That’s why macs used to be “virus proof”.

          Well, yes, because Windows was a much more lucrative target.

      • Ferk
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        How can Apple debunk it?

        If I told you I know of a way by which I can “hack” the lock of your house to enter it, how can you prove whether I’m lying or not? Specially if I’m not willing to show you how I do it, and I haven’t given you any proof of having actually done it that you can try to dispute.

          • Ferk
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            They aren’t saying that the email/number is part of the message. What the are saying is that they are able to decrypt the logs in order to identify the senders .

            It could be they cross-reference matching some internal ids / tokens / physical addresses of the devices together with all the data the Chinese government already has (or can obtain) …or it could be a bluff… who knows… there’s not enough information, and what we know is probably distorted.

      • Aatube
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        Why would they? They have all their production logistics in China.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3411 months ago

    Apple has been taking massive Ls after Ls wrt the security of their iPhones in recent times. It’s almost as if magically branding your products “private and secure” doesn’t work.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1611 months ago

      Finding an exploit created by state-level actor is not a massive L. They have shown in the past that they are able to hack air gaped systems, weaken commonly used security standards and implant vulnerabilities into commercial software. I don’t think you will find a company that is immune to this. Other than that, did they really have so many security issues recently?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Read the article. The exploit was found by the state actors not created by them. Apple is ultimately responsible for the mishap due to the insecure design of the aforementioned feature.

        Even though China partially had a hand in the creation of this flaw according to the history of the feature.

        And yes, Apple has been a constant feature on the news for such privacy leaks of late. You just haven’t been paying attention.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          611 months ago

          If state actor would create it it would be a backdoor. Exploits are by definition bugs/security issues that can be… well, exploited and state-level actors are really good at finding them. Still, if it takes resources of state actor to find an exploit I don’t think it’s a massive L. Yes, it’s totally possible they had some other serious security issues recently and I haven’t been paying attention. That’s why I’m asking.

      • redfellow
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Ordering your hardware from China makes it a tad bit easier to shoehorn backdoors in it.

  • Optional
    link
    2111 months ago

    Usually when one of Apple’s security measures is breached, the company would issue an update to patch it. We’d hope this will happen here, but the Chinese government is likely to apply pressure on the iPhone maker to leave the exploit unpatched – at least, on Chinese devices.

    WELL, Apple? ? . . . We’re waiting

    • @rdri
      link
      711 months ago

      Too busy protecting iOS users from iMessages of unauthorized color.

  • Southern Wolf
    link
    fedilink
    1811 months ago

    While I have little respect for Apple’s overall privacy practices, this sounds a lot like the CCP making something up to scare protesters and dissidents from using AirDrop. There’s no sensible reason they would be advertising such an exploit openly, especially when it could potentially be used to secretly spy on dissidents, protesters, or even used in foreign espionage. Something doesn’t sit right with this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      Well if Apple doesn’t fix it, like they haven’t fixed the iMessage flaws) they’ve known about for years, then it’s still useful.

      And most people won’t even know of this issue, and they’d still use Airdrop anyway, saying “I’m not interesting enough to spy on”.

      iMessage lacks forward secrecy, so if I get your RSA key which never changes, I can read all your old messages and any new ones too. And that’s just one issue with iMessage. And people don’t know about it, and still use it, thinking it’s secure. (it’s pretty good in my opinion, just wish Apple would fix the issues linked article).

  • Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Probably not a reliable source but you should still use Foss with strong encryption (RSA2048+ ideally)

  • Bappity
    link
    English
    4
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    only reason that I can see why they’re saying they’ve done this has to be some kind of scare tactic

    would be a bit stupid to reveal this hand otherwise