• @hperrin
    link
    18911 months ago

    Yeah, while he was president. That’s the problem.

    • theodewere
      link
      fedilink
      5311 months ago

      find a Clause without Trump’s shit on it, i challenge you

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1711 months ago

        The Santa Clause?

        Wait… Tim Allen! NOOOOOOOOO!!!

        For a former drug dealer, you’re pretty uncool…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1111 months ago

          For a former drug dealer

          Who snitched on his buddies, don’t forget. He’s always been trash. (Which, really, breaks my heart. I loved Home Improvement and The Santa Clause as a kid and I have to admit he’s good in Galaxy Quest.)

          Sigourney Weaver wrote it best… “Go fuck yourself, Tim”

    • @dhork
      link
      English
      2611 months ago

      It turns out the President can do whatever he wants as long as 34 Senators let him

  • @jordanlundM
    link
    9411 months ago

    For those wondering why this is a big deal:

    US Constitution, Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8:

    “no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

    Emolument:

    https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/emolument#Noun

    emolument (plural emoluments)

    (formal) Payment for employment or an office; compensation for a job, which is usually monetary. synonyms ▲quotations ▼Synonyms: compensation, fee, payment, remuneration

    • @AstridWipenaugh
      link
      5
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I wonder how this will go down in court. It clearly says “person” and the money was paid to a corporation. Trump’s businesses aren’t holding any office, therefore the constitution wasn’t violated. That’s obviously horse shit, but they’re arguing that the presidency isn’t an office (CO ballot case). So if they win that it seems likely SCOTUS will drop a nuke on the emoluments clause too.

      • @Rakonat
        link
        English
        1211 months ago

        According to Citizens United Supreme Court ruling, Corporations are people. So lets put it to the test. If you can give unlimited campaign contributions to a PAC through a corporations, than a corporation, and it’s executives, would equally be liable under the law for violating the constitution.

  • @Chemical
    link
    English
    9411 months ago

    The more we look, the more we find, the more the crazy’s love him. I don’t get it. Will be happy when he is no longer in front of my face at every turn.

    • @Wrench
      link
      4411 months ago

      If a Democrat does it, it’s vile corruption that warrants vigilante justice. If a republican does it, it’s being smart.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2811 months ago

        If a Democrat’s son allegedly does it while not actually being in office himself, it means you have to impeach the father.

      • Optional
        link
        611 months ago

        Which, of course they don’t even believe or say that, because a logical system of ideology is not what they’re playing at. It’s just straight up smash-n-grab while the right wing propaganda flows unimpeded.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        611 months ago

        Same, although I’d be even happier if he got a stroke which lead to locked in syndrome for a decade or so.

  • DigitalTraveler42
    link
    English
    45
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    “It’s treason then…”

    Meanwhile Left wing voters in 2024: “So this is how liberty dies . . . with thunderous applause”

    • Gormadt
      link
      fedilink
      2311 months ago

      And entirely too many lefties, “I don’t like either candidate so I won’t vote.”

      Or worse (and thankfully a much smaller number), “I’m going to let trump get power again so things can really bad really quick so we can get The Revolution™ started.”

      Picking the lesser of 2 evils is unfortunately how our system functions. And not voting at all ensures that the candidate you hate the most has an easier time winning. And I’d prefer if the worst candidate doesn’t get power so we can actually change things for the better.

      • TimeSquirrel
        link
        fedilink
        1211 months ago

        “I’m going to let trump get power again so things can really bad really quick so we can get The Revolution™ started.”

        “Revolution now?”

        “Not at the moment, I have too much shit going on and I don’t need to go to prison or anything for some dumb shit. There are people depending on me.”

        Destroys society

        “How about now?”

        • Gormadt
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          “I can’t, I’ve got to keep my head down to survive”

      • Optional
        link
        1011 months ago

        I’m not buying that yet. I think the whole “oooh gen whatever is turning on biden” is a truckload of bullshit printed up by The Usual Suspects.

        Voter participation has been very high even recently.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          511 months ago

          I will definitely vote for Biden, but his disgusting simping for Israel makes me a lot less inclined to donate money to his campaign. I might end up only donating to anti-Trump PACs instead.

          • Alien Nathan Edward
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            if you’re voting for someone and not fighting with them after they win you’re only doing half a democracy. people talk about “the lesser of two evils” but there’s no realistic situation in which you agree with the person you’re voting for on all things, so there is no strategy that doesn’t include the “lesser evil”. The fact is that Biden sucks shit. The other fact is that Trump is much worse on all things, including whatever you happen to be pissed of at Biden about. So the choice seems to be “do I spite the guy who pissed me off but actually make the situation worse, or do I do what’s in my power to make the situation better, vote for the guy who pissed me off as a stopgap and then do everything I can to bully him into actually doing the right thing?”

        • TechyDad
          link
          411 months ago

          Also, it is easy to say “I’m not voting for Biden, I want someone else” right now. There aren’t any consequences.

          But come November and suddenly the consequences become more immediate. Many more people say they will vote third party than actually do it once in the voting booth.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3711 months ago

    Can I just say that this is my absolute favorite picture of him. It’s the exact same expression my kids made when they shit in their diapers.

    • TechyDad
      link
      2211 months ago

      I knew I recognized that expression.

      “Are you pooping?”

      “Nnnnnnoooo?”

      “You’re pooping aren’t you?”

      “Not anymore!”

    • @ZhaoYadang
      link
      111 months ago

      Prob because he just shit his diaper. Pretty much confirmed that he’s had Depends for the past 20 years.

  • PugJesus
    link
    fedilink
    3311 months ago

    A rare true statement from his puckered asshole of a face.

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      3311 months ago

      “I don’t get $8 million for doing nothing,” he said.

      Yeah, we know.

        • Optional
          link
          111 months ago

          Yeah but per SCOTUS, so?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I haven’t recognized the legitimacy of the court since Barrett and Kavanaugh were installed, and neither should you. Of course I understand the reality of them wielding a lot of power, but I used to think that when I disagreed with their rulings it was because they understand the law better than I do. Now I only entertain that notion for unanimous rulings.

  • Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    2211 months ago

    Yes, destroying the democracy of the USA.

  • Chainweasel
    link
    English
    2011 months ago

    The only “services” Trump provided during his presidency were under Putin’s table.

    • @ripcord
      link
      211 months ago

      He’s not actually in trouble for this one, is he?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        Sorry for the lateness, this falls across a few of his ongoing and upcoming cases. Taking money from a foreign government and taking money for your business are both not legal for a president. Not that it matters if they don’t charge him for it or convict him though.

            • @ripcord
              link
              110 months ago

              Oh, ok. Since there’s lots and lots of other 3-letter words that wasn’t clear at all.

              Also I don’t think people are praying for that word, it doesn’t mean anything or imply anything will happen.