• @Rolando
    link
    929 months ago

    That’s disgusting. Why aren’t there any ads on the cliff walls?

      • WashedOver
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        OMG do you mean a 15 minute city!?!? How dare they focus us to live in such a place. They are bound to make us stop rolling coal with our trucks while they are at it! Freedum!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    479 months ago

    Being the U.S, there’s basically zero chance that it would be high-rises. Instead, there would be McMansions. Also a lot more parking lots

    • @Rolando
      link
      79 months ago

      The McMansions are on the cliffs above. The high-rises are for the workers.

      • @TheIllustrativeMan
        link
        69 months ago

        McMansions are for workers. That’s how they got their name. Big like mansions, but built as cheap as possible so that they’re (relatively) affordable… Until they start falling apart in 15 years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      This looks like low-mid density. So much roads/wasted space and like 10 high rites do not make a high density neighborhood.

    • @LemmyKnowsBest
      link
      29 months ago

      No, real estate moguls have learned that apartments and high-rise condos and hotels are more profitable than single family homes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          If they rezone a national park to residential it will definitely be highrise MDU.

          Edit more space efficient for the NIMGC tree huggers

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            19 months ago

            Why do you say that? We destroy plenty of nature and it almost always ends up single family home suburban sprawl.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              Continuous grade of square footage is one factor, the suburb would have trouble with sprawl and boulder ingress

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                19 months ago

                Yes, car centric suburbs have tons of problems but when has that ever stopped us? We build them in literal flood plains, and along cramped mudslide prone mountains. I’ve never heard of an empty piece of land in the middle of nowhere being zoned for high density residential in the US.

  • @AllonzeeLV
    link
    26
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I mean fuck it, we’ve already exterminated entire biomes of species who dared to exist where we wanted strip malls, what’s another pretty geological formation?

    We might be the worst neighbor in the entire universe, because we handily win that title on Earth.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    209 months ago

    There’s actually a settlement down there already, they have to get their mail delivered by pack mule from the top of the canyon’s post office

    • The Pantser
      link
      79 months ago

      What’s the Amazon deliver time?

      • SuperDuper
        link
        119 months ago

        They just throw it down the side of the cliff

    • @RagingRobot
      link
      39 months ago

      They should get a giant slide. Mail slide!

    • @3ntranced
      link
      19 months ago

      I’d think a zip line would be a much more efficient method of getting mail down. Then again it could just be a case of “well the mules already go down each day so they might as well carry mail”.

  • @postmateDumbass
    link
    209 months ago

    Must be from California, loves to build on flood plain instead of high ground.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    149 months ago

    Seriously though. We Europeans joke about the US a lot, but one thing I’ll always envy/admire is your National Parks. You have to protect those at all costs.

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      49 months ago

      If Trump gets back in, they’ll all be leased for oil development.

  • @Everythingispenguins
    cake
    link
    139 months ago

    Okay that is not the Grand Canyon. The is the Vermilion Cliffs which is just up river from the Grand Canyon NP.

      • @Rolando
        link
        49 months ago

        Sounds like an excuse to raise their rents.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        Road-level parking should probably be addressed. That picture requires some touches.

        But seriously, one could plan some nifty town, resisting flash floods, perhaps even utilizing them.

        It might look gloriously out of this world. Only some bodies floating by might ruin it. Tourist campers upstream somewhere… Animal carcasses… Eh. Some filter, perhaps. A big mesh somewhere?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    109 months ago

    I know this is just a joke, but having at least an “alpine” or “mountain” coaster down to the bottom could save many lives.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    A) It’s a National Park and you wouldn’t be able to have a city esp with a Walmart on a National Park.

    B) Like 90% of Arizona is untouched wilderness and undeveloped. Why would you want to develop at the bottom of the GC when you could develop literally anywhere else in the state? The cost of transporting construction materials, given that there aren’t any roads from the surface to the bottom, not to mention logistics for people living and working in the Canyon, would be astronomical.