• @wikibotB
      link
      English
      105 months ago

      Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

      A betavoltaic device (betavoltaic cell or betavoltaic battery) is a type of nuclear battery which generates electric current from beta particles (electrons) emitted from a radioactive source, using semiconductor junctions. A common source used is the hydrogen isotope tritium. Unlike most nuclear power sources which use nuclear radiation to generate heat which then is used to generate electricity, betavoltaic devices use a non-thermal conversion process, converting the electron-hole pairs produced by the ionization trail of beta particles traversing a semiconductor.Betavoltaic power sources (and the related technology of alphavoltaic power sources) are particularly well-suited to low-power electrical applications where long life of the energy source is needed, such as implantable medical devices or military and space applications.

      to opt out, pm me ‘optout’. article | about

        • @Asudox
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’ve done that so that it appears highlighted and seperated. Which client do you use? It’s definitely readable for me.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            It appears using a monospaced font on Jerboa. It’s definitely less readable than if it was in a block quote style IMO

            Edit: I’d also request that you wrap the whole thing in spoiler tags so that it collapses and doesn’t take a bunch of vertical space in a thread

            • @Asudox
              link
              English
              35 months ago

              Thanks for the suggestions. I’ll look into them.

            • @Asudox
              link
              English
              15 months ago

              Alright so, I added a sentence reduction functionality so the bot’s responses should be smaller now and also instead of using code markdown, I just made it so that the text appears bold. The spoiler markdown seems a bit unneeded here as the sentence reduction should already make the text small.

        • @wikibotB
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          deleted by creator

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    125 months ago

    What’s the specific energy and power? If it isn’t terrible, could be very good for things like spacecraft.

    • @Oderus
      link
      English
      215 months ago

      With all the CCP misinformation about them making 5nn chips, this could be another bullshit tech coming from the CCP.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      205 months ago

      Deep space probes are already nuclear power sources.

      Right now this is mostly a radio isotope heat source and a peltier device to convert the temperature differential to electricity.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yeah, RTDs. But I don’t know if these semi conductor based ones would have better performance.

        • WHYAREWEALLCAPS
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          Not for space craft if what @MilderRichter says is right. To generate power from a peltier you need a temperature differential between the two sides. It is very hard to bleed off heat in space since it’s a vacuum. That means a temperature differential is very difficult to achieve and it takes power to do that. Which would necessitate more of these, which means a bigger or additional heat removal system, which means you need more of these, which means a bigger or additional heat removal system, etc, etc, etc.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      105 months ago

      According to the article, it outputs 100 micro watts at 3 volts. Apparently for 50 years.

      • @Cort
        link
        English
        45 months ago

        So less than 150watthours over its entire lifespan?

  • Virtual Insanity
    link
    English
    75 months ago

    So you’d need 10,000 of them to generate 1 watt.

    Sounds useless.

  • lettruthout
    link
    English
    45 months ago

    Just what we need, radioactive materials in our waste stream.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          With the amounts being talked about, it’s not really that much of a concern. We aren’t talking about putting a demon core in your pocket.

          • @PlutoniumAcid
            link
            English
            25 months ago

            One individual Duracell is also pretty harmless but I sure am glad that people don’t throw them into nature.

              • @PlutoniumAcid
                link
                English
                15 months ago

                That is exactly what I commented on. See OC:

                radioactive materials in our waste stream

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  I took “waste stream” to mean “the process after a device is no longer used.” Some waste is recycled, some is out in landfill, and more than should ends up in nature.

                  Most of the time, these types of things would be recycled. But obviously that doesn’t happen all the time. The rest of the time will be dominated by landfill, but that’s actually not that huge a problem. It’s not like the metals are going to grow legs and run around irradiating stuff any more than a Duracell. The last group is the environment proper, but keep in mind there’s already radioactive shit out and about in the world. You can find radioactive rocks literally just laying on the ground. It’s not actually that much of a danger unless a large amount of radioactive material (or a small amount of highly irradiated material which this is not) manages to find its way into a pile.

                  Honestly, I’d be more concerned about the conventional pollution aspect than the radiation.

  • @werefreeatlast
    link
    English
    45 months ago

    Meanwhile the Voyager proves launched in 1977 are still live and kicking. Yeah one of them is getting pissy at us but it’s still rolling.