The House Freedom Caucus railed against the latest short-term government funding bill, suggesting it is a “surrender” to the left as lawmakers seek to avert a government shutdown by the looming Friday deadline.
“The @HouseGOP is planning to pass a short-term spending bill continuing Pelosi levels with Biden policies, to buy time to pass longer-term spending bills at Pelosi levels with Biden policies. This is what surrender looks like,” the House Freedom Caucus wrote in a post on X, formerly Twitter.
Congressional leaders struck the deal last week, just days ahead of the Friday night shutdown deadline. The two-step plan, unveiled on Sunday night, would push the funding threat into early March and allow more time for spending talks past the Jan. 19 funding deadline. As a result, funding for some areas of the government would be extended through March 1 and for the rest of the agencies, through March 8.
‘This is what surrender looks like’
You guys would know. Your champion surrendered to the police several times now.
Their other champion surrendered in 1865.
Wearing women’s clothing. Which is something I thought they didn’t like men to do.
I’m sure you guys are used to surrendering. Cry some more ya traitorous fucks.
I wish the HFC would shut the fuck up.
More like House Fucking Crybabies
This is what governing looks like.
Which is why none of them recognize it.
Just kick it down the road, someone else will pick it up
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Congressional leaders struck the deal last week, just days ahead of the Friday night shutdown deadline.
The current CR was favored by House GOP members at the time, who saw it as a way to avoid a massive single omnibus spending bill at the end of last year.
The short-term CR would give Congress more time to hash out and approve the 12 full-year appropriations bills, to the ire of hard-line House Republicans who have typically opposed such legislation and advocated instead for long-term spending deals.
House conservatives have long pushed for spending reductions, while some Republicans are insisting border policy changes must be attached to any funding measure.
Such opposition from the right means Johnson will likely have to shore up Democratic votes to pass the CR in the lower chamber, further fueling the fury of the far right.
to pull out of the deal, but when Johnson floated the idea of a long-term CR to a group of moderate Republicans, nearly all lawmakers said no to the suggestion, one attendee told The Hill last week.
The original article contains 410 words, the summary contains 177 words. Saved 57%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
“First time?” - progressives
