Seems like an interesting effort. A developer is building an alternative Java-based backend to Lemmy’s Rust-based one, with the goal of building in a handful of different features. The dev is looking at using this compatibility to migrate their instance over to the new platform, while allowing the community to use their apps of choice.

  • Melmi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5711 months ago

    It’s kind of ironic taking a project that’s already written in Rust and writing a replacement for it in Java.

    Usually things get ported to Rust, not the other way around.

      • Spaz
        link
        1111 months ago

        Same. Let’s slow things down! IDK what they were thinking?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I mean, Java has faster developer speed since it’s much less complicated than Rust. But it will also use a lot more memory. That being said, I guess most of what happens in Lemmy is database queries anyway and that will go equally fast in Java.

          Rust is a very fast language but for a web app like Lemmy it’s probably not that important that it’s rust underneath.

          But I really dislike Java. Lots of issues with code only working on a specific JDK, and code being very ugly due to all classes and shit.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Java has faster developer speed since it’s much less complicated than Rust

            [citation needed]

            To give some context: Exception-based error handling is insanely complex. The error handling of Rust is much simpler to reason about. Finding out where errors happen is a lot simpler.

            The only Java dev I know is an older guy who started university with me at the same time - I was 20, he was 45. He knew Java, I didn’t. Java is not the future if you ask me.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              211 months ago

              No of course not. But it’s faster to code in since you don’t have to worry about the borrow checker.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                311 months ago

                “faster to code in”… I would not say so. In my personal experience, Rust can be very fast to code in once you get comfortable with it, since you barely even need to run your code to know that it works. You also save a lot of time via less debugging.

    • @somethingp
      link
      311 months ago

      Yeah this sounds like someone doesn’t know rust and instead of learning it they’re porting to Java? It might also be a way to capture an existing userbase as it’s still compatible with lemmy, but also adds features that might cause more people to use it. But being written in Java is an excuse to make it more difficult to migrate the additions back upstream to lemmy. Maybe they hope that this will eventually allow them to build out a private platform?

    • @NightAuthor
      link
      English
      2611 months ago

      They’re sticking to the existing standard tho

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2611 months ago

      This sentiment is so overplayed and seems especially out of place in the context of the fediverse.

    • 0x1C3B00DA
      link
      fedilink
      1111 months ago

      That’s not applicable. Sublinks is using the same standard as Lemmy/kbin/mbin, i.e. ActivityPub. In a decentralized system based on an open standard, plurality of implementations is a good thing. We shouldn’t want lemmy to be the only one.

    • capital
      link
      611 months ago

      Not applicable.