A bill set to be introduced next month would ban consuming or producing sexual content and punish offenders with prison sentences of up to 20 years and $25,000 fines.

  • AlteredStateBlob
    link
    fedilink
    1444 months ago

    Bet you, every single one of the cunts pushing for this would have to immediately be convicted under the very same laws.

      • @EvilEyedPanda
        link
        English
        434 months ago

        Like American Marijuana laws, the cops didnt really care about people smoking weed, it was a convient way to put black people in jail.

        • @Viking_Hippie
          link
          English
          284 months ago

          Black people and hippies. The two groups Nixon hated more than anyone else.

          • @jaybone
            link
            English
            44 months ago

            Wasn’t too fond of Asians either…

    • @Junkers_Klunker
      link
      English
      234 months ago

      Itll only be enforced against people they dont like.

    • Aviandelight
      link
      fedilink
      English
      174 months ago

      They want something to feel special about. Conservatives love getting away with stuff that is “wrong” and since society has normalized a lot of previously “wrong” behaviors these people no longer have anything to feel special about. Subjugating others is how they get off.

  • @MrJameGumb
    link
    English
    814 months ago

    So they basically just want to abolish free speech? This is the first step in that process. Once they get one law passed about something like porn it makes it super easy to amend that law at any time to include anything the state deems to be “dangerous”.

    • IWantToFuckSpez
      link
      fedilink
      254 months ago

      Yeah porn is the easy target since not many politicians in Oklahoma are going to oppose it. Since it could damage their political image. Nobody wants to be labeled the porno guy/gal in the right wing news.

      • @TORFdot0
        link
        English
        64 months ago

        You better be married to spez if you live in Oklahoma or you are going to jail

  • @eran_morad
    link
    English
    784 months ago

    While we’re arbitrarily disregarding the constitution, i now declare all assault rifles illegal. Suck my dick, asscunts.

  • @Cuttlefish1111
    link
    English
    664 months ago

    This guy has the look of someone with a rape dungeon

    • @Son_of_dad
      link
      English
      264 months ago

      He looks like he has a diaper fetish

    • Bizarroland
      link
      fedilink
      54 months ago

      Dusty deavers? There’s no way that is not his twink porn name.

  • @Viking_Hippie
    link
    English
    584 months ago

    any “acts of sexual intercourse,” including those that are “normal or perverted, actual or simulated.”

    So there goes the majority of mainstream movies too, I guess 🤦

  • Carighan Maconar
    link
    English
    494 months ago

    I would propose expanding the second part to include oral and written delivery, not just digital. The only valid form of sexual dialogue is to be dance.

      • Norgur
        link
        fedilink
        19
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yes, but they don’t know that because they never actually read their “word of god” but get a raging erection when they hallucinate about a “good ol’ time” that actually never existed in the first place.

      • @TexasDrunk
        link
        English
        34 months ago

        If you’re not conveying both your sexual desire and prowess in a dance, then yeah. You’re doing it wrong. It’s why I never learned to dance.

  • @BaseModelHuman
    link
    English
    444 months ago

    That’s harsher fines than being an insurrectionist.

  • @SocialMediaRefugee
    link
    English
    364 months ago

    What is with the steady criminalization and paranoia with all things sexual in the last 15 yrs or so? It feels like more than the usual paranoia.

    • @ZMonster
      link
      English
      224 months ago

      I believe it is how self-proclaimed christians are responding to sexual and gender liberty/tolerance. They see it as lost ground in their crusade against deviance. So they are escalating things beyond reason in order to sooth their own conscience.

      That’s how I see it. Closeted bigots being closeted bigots.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        74 months ago

        Also feels like Gen z is more prudish and so, even if they don’t really agree with these movements, they also aren’t as affected, so don’t really care about it happening either.

      • @damirK
        link
        English
        54 months ago

        And they know the rules will never apply to them anyway even if they get caught. Win win

      • @Noedel
        link
        English
        44 months ago

        Exactly. If they don’t understand, like or want it for themselves, nobody is allowes to have it and they will defund, ban and punish.

        See sexuality, reproductive health, the arts, basic education, etc.

    • @HWK_290
      link
      English
      74 months ago

      They’re losing the culture war, both at a societal level and a political one. So they’re lashing out, ideally with what are the last gasps of their regressive ideology

    • Lemminary
      link
      English
      294 months ago

      Did you just spell out the V word?? Fined and imprisoned, sinner!

  • @FrankTheHealer
    link
    English
    274 months ago

    The lawmakers pushing this should have their browsing history and message logs examined by a team of data recovery experts.

    I can assure you, they are into some weird shit but they spout these bullshit platitudes about turning others away from sin. It’s almost certainly because they are embarrassed or insecure about their own desires.

    See also : every right leaning politician who was secretly closeted gay

  • HuddaBudda
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.

    MOST porn is art because it has a camera as a medium, and it is viewed as “Entertainment”, this bill will have no teeth on arrival.

    My main problem is that this kind of logic is next door neighbors with, “That woman was dressed in a pornographic way! She should be dressed from head to toe in black!”

    Edit: correction

    • @FlexibleToast
      link
      94 months ago

      Wasn’t this exactly what the Larry Flint case was about already? Sounds like political grand standing, so they can say they did something even if that something is completely moot anyway.

    • Saik0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      “That woman was dressed in a pornographic way! She should be dressed from head to toe in black!”

      There’s no production there. Though… if we were to accept that it counts for “production” then technically… if you the “viewer” of that person view it in a sexual way, you’d be able to be held by the law as well.

  • @Poem_for_your_sprog
    link
    English
    224 months ago

    Guess they’ll have to disconnect the Internet in Oklahoma then.

    • thisisbutaname
      link
      fedilink
      English
      224 months ago

      In the wise words of Dr. Cox, if they removed all porn from the Internet there would be only one website left, saying bring back the porn.

  • @Treczoks
    link
    English
    164 months ago

    Can anyone tell me which year it is in Oklahoma? It can’t be anything starting with 20, 19, or even 18, that’s for sure.

    • @SocialMediaRefugee
      link
      English
      134 months ago

      Well witch burning is next along with sponsoring a fleet of explorers to see what lies across the western ocean.

  • Bunnylux
    link
    English
    124 months ago

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA