• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11010 months ago

    If someone says they have nothing to hide, I ask if they also leave the door open when they use a public rest room.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yeah or tell them you need to look at all of their emails and texts right now. Will also need to listen to recordings of every phone call they’ve ever made.

      • PlasterAnalyst
        link
        fedilink
        010 months ago

        You can just do a foia request for that. Just put in very specific language, like “any and all communications containing the words “nr" "ft” “r****d”” and that will get them paranoid af.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1610 months ago

      If they’re in the USA they don’t need to.

      There’s gaps all around the edges that a small child can fit through.

    • @Donjuanme
      link
      910 months ago

      The right wing (small government? Don’t look into things that aren’t your business?) Would like to require genital checks before bathroom usage, but only for a certain "type"of person.

  • PlasterAnalyst
    link
    fedilink
    3210 months ago

    It’s not illegal to monitor someone’s smart water meter as it’s not encrypted. You can tell whenever they shower or go to the bathroom and then send them a log of their activity. It’s not illegal

      • PlasterAnalyst
        link
        fedilink
        410 months ago

        You can’t get a restraining order unless the person threatens you. It’s also not stalking under my states law.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            610 months ago

            Incredible way to reply “sus”.

            Wondered where that was from:

            In Transformers: Age of Extinction, a 20 year old man shows the father of a 17 year old girl a laminated card of a Texas State law to justify him being in a sexual relationship with the 17 year old girl. This actually happens in the movie.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          310 months ago

          Always wondered what stalking actually was - I mean paparazzi seem legally well protected.

          A new (June 2023) US Supreme Court “standard essentially brushes a street protester with the same stroke as a persistent obsessive who subjects someone to intense and long-term technologically enabled abuse”. Oof.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’m not sure this is true… That’s like saying it’s OK to enter someone else’s house because they accidentally left the door open. Just because it isn’t encrypted doesn’t mean it’s meant for you to listen to.

      Edit: I was under the impression that most smart meters used 4G (at least in the US)… Pretty sure it’s illegal to listen to cell communications.

      • PlasterAnalyst
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        They use an open frequency, not the cell network. You can use an inexpensive rtl-sdr to monitor them. People do it all the time to integrate their meter with home assistant.

        It’s no different than looking at someone’s WiFi network name.

      • @Mango
        link
        110 months ago

        Actually wire tapping is illegal but listening to radio frequencies isn’t. Go figure.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      210 months ago

      Better yet, sell their showering activities to shower head manufacturers, and the NSA. Idk why the NSA wants to know when you shower, but I guarantee they do.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        The NSA is more bothered about the frequency of your showering.

    • Gabe BellOP
      link
      English
      -210 months ago

      I think your understanding of the law is sadly lacking and would definitely get you arrested.

      • PlasterAnalyst
        link
        fedilink
        610 months ago

        If it’s an open radio signal then it’s not illegal to listen to it. It’s no different than a radio station.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          710 months ago

          Potentially not, but if you do that + send them a log of your activity then you’ve absolutely opened yourself up to an investigation.

          • PlasterAnalyst
            link
            fedilink
            010 months ago

            Investigation of what exactly? There’s nothing illegal about it if you don’t make any threats. You could follow someone around and take pictures and notes on them too, not illegal.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Text messages: Written or typed messages sent electronically, typically via mobile phones or other digital devices.

              Voicemails: Recorded audio messages left on voicemail systems or digital recording devices.

              Videos: Visual recordings, either in the form of video clips or other visual media, capturing incidents related to the stalking.

              Cards, photos, or letters: Physical or digital materials like greeting cards, photographs, or written correspondences that may have been sent by the stalker.

              Unwanted gifts or items: Physical objects or digital transfers of items that were given to the victim without their consent or desire.

              Social media friend requests or following: Instances where the stalker attempted to connect with or monitor the victim through social media platforms.

              Emails: Digital messages sent through electronic mail services, often containing relevant information or threats.

              This is just a list of information I found on what counts as evidence stalking.

              Do whatever you want dude, good luck. Lemme know how it goes!

              • PlasterAnalyst
                link
                fedilink
                -110 months ago

                The rule are different for public figures. They’re not allowed to retaliate for public participation.

        • Gabe BellOP
          link
          English
          110 months ago

          Yeah – I think you are wildly wrong about that.

    • Gabe BellOP
      link
      English
      -1010 months ago

      Not me. That film was crap.

      • NickwithaC
        link
        English
        810 months ago

        How would you know?

        • Gabe BellOP
          link
          English
          510 months ago

          I watched it. Bored the crap out of me.

          But the question is in the present tense, and I can definitely say I don’t watch it again.

        • @CluckN
          link
          010 months ago

          They watched the TV show

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            510 months ago

            It was a mistake to have Dr Manhattan not glow. Without the glow he just looks like a guy painted blue, he looked amazing in his debut when he glowed.

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            Dunno if this was a dig at the show, but as a fan of the original graphic novel, I thought it was great.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Until I start getting paid for my data being used for profit of others then my privacy is a form of self value preservation.

    And I’ll look out my blinds at you if I want.

    I’ll take photos, say hi sometimes and wish you a good day. Welcome to a planet full of living creatures.

    • Gabe BellOP
      link
      English
      2710 months ago

      Watching people on the street in public is very different to staring into someone’s house – their private residence.

      Or would you be happy with someone standing in front of your house, taking pictures of everything you do in your front room?

      If you saw someone doing that, wouldn’t you be tempted to close the blinds?

    • @grue
      link
      English
      1210 months ago

      No, no, he had it right the first time: the sorts of people who want to look in your windows really do want to reign, like an autocrat.

      .

      (I’m just riffing off your comment to make a point. I don’t actually think the person was that clever and agree it was a typo.)

      • Gabe BellOP
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I thought it was “free reign” but reign as in the way you reign a horse – you give your horse “free reign” to do as it wishes.

        EDIT : huh. Turns out I am right, but you “rein” a horse not “reign”. Derp!

          • Gabe BellOP
            link
            English
            210 months ago

            (grin) Yeah – I realised that after I wrote it.

            As unbelievable as it sounds I had only ever heard it said – I’d never seen it written down. (Or if I have I don’t remember seeing it written down – must have been twenty, thirty years ago.) I am not a horse person, so I don’t deal with vocab relating to horses all that often.

            Just one of those things I guess.

            • Timwi
              link
              fedilink
              410 months ago

              Don’t be too hard on yourself. English spelling is not exactly cooperative.

              • @harmsy
                link
                210 months ago

                A little too ironic, and yeah I really do think.

    • @A7thStone
      link
      710 months ago

      I thought it was free rain, like the water falling from the sky.

  • Lath
    link
    fedilink
    1410 months ago

    Nah, it’s a fetish. Don’t be kink-shaming now!

      • Lath
        link
        fedilink
        1210 months ago

        Well now you’re just complicating things. But it’s ok, that’s a kink too.

        • @Viking_Hippie
          link
          510 months ago

          So you’re saying that Avril Lavigne’s breakthrough hit was about kink shaming? 🤔

          • Lath
            link
            fedilink
            410 months ago

            Oh yeah. Definitely. Gotta follow your kinks or you’ll miss out on one of the better things life has to offer.

            • @Viking_Hippie
              link
              810 months ago

              Wait…you’re saying that her kink is kink shaming? This is getting awfully complicated…

              • Lath
                link
                fedilink
                710 months ago

                No, no. It’s even more complicated than that. Her kink is kink shaming kink shaming…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1310 months ago

    I love this clipping. I can’t use it since it’s got a comma splice, and I can’t promote that.

    • @Bayz0r
      link
      110 months ago

      Upvote for comma splice hatred.

  • @SocialMediaRefugee
    link
    1110 months ago

    I have neighbors who I swear want passersby to look. Every window is open, the front door is left open and every light is on in the house.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      310 months ago

      When I was a young adult we started getting concerned about the number of cameras popping up everywhere. Then some news story ran that said an average person is filmed around 20 times throughout the course of their day. We all found that to be horrifying. Now that number is probably several thousand times per day, and people do not fucking care. It doesn’t make sense to me. I care, but I’m made to feel like a weirdo if I ever say that.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        410 months ago

        CCTV cameras have somewhat of a different connotation though. They are in a public space, no one’s pointing a camera into your front room, they are looking at streets and roads.

        I used to actually watch CCTV as a job (stupidly boring) trust me no one looks at that footage. They just have an algorithm that pulls up anything it deems relevant, and possibly AI now, then a human looks at that relevant 30 seconds of footage or whatever. Unless the monitoring systems flag something up, there is virtually zero chance anyone is going to have a look at it.

        In theory I could have used the cameras to watch a single person but in practice there are monitoring logs someone would have noticed what I was doing and called me out on it. Besides we were all far too busy watching the crows staring into the camera lens.

  • @Windex007
    link
    510 months ago

    Just flat out ask them to take off all of their clothes, you can’t lose.

    Either they start to backtrack and realize that they do actually have boundaries, or things are about to get sexy. Either way, big win.

  • @UnderpantsWeevil
    link
    510 months ago

    Ask Edward Snowden about the criminal penalties for voyarism.

  • @j4k3
    link
    English
    010 months ago

    deleted by creator