• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6910 months ago

    He said it to skirt consequences. There are still far too many people that think he’s a journalist.

    • @an_onanistOP
      link
      610 months ago

      True AND it is the easiest way to dismiss his actions. Added bonus, if he tries to admit he is a journalist and not an entertainer, back to court he goes.

  • @MrJameGumb
    link
    1210 months ago

    Wait, do you mean to tell me that anyone still gives a shit about Tucker Carlson??? 😱

    • @AlternatePersonMan
      link
      2410 months ago

      Unfortunately lots of people do.

      I wish any program that even remotely associates itself with being news has to identify that it’s entertainment and not to be taken as fact, at the start of every episode. Probably still wouldn’t help, but maybe …

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      610 months ago

      If he was insignificant, Putin wouldn’t have given him an interview. He’s a useful idiot for the people who want to turn the US into a Russian vassal state.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -710 months ago

      This response is kind of showing how out of touch you are. What is your super informed opinion on Joe Rogan’s listener-ship levels. And for an extra challenge please respond in a way that shows you aren’t out of touch (impossible).

      • @MrJameGumb
        link
        4
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Sure, I’ll get right on that dude… 🙄

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -2110 months ago

      Dude really? He is more popular than ever and actually reports on interesting things. Is there a single person in the corporate media that does a more interesting job?

          • Concetta
            link
            fedilink
            410 months ago

            Compared to Tucker Carlson? Hard disagree. His show actually does research, Tucker is a stochastic terrorist.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -4
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              His “research” is propaganda, you just have to examine it a little and it falls apart. I am not saying he is always wrong, but his monlogues are almost always misleading at best. For example I could say “Dont go to old folks homes because nearly 25% of people die there!” That could be correct, but its misleading. You can see through it because its obvious, but he is more subtle.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    510 months ago

    Wow. You heard it here folks. Tucker Carlson is over. He’s finished. No one will ever listen to him ever again.

  • @thantik
    link
    English
    210 months ago

    These are not mutually exclusive things. You can be both. Not that Tucker is either, but - yeah.