FX’s John Landgraf is not sure the media ecosystem supports television shows that run beyond just a few seasons.
deleted by creator
Well, Nah. The problem is that lack of plot, and just milking viewers with fillers, and get cancelled without ever actually completing the character’s arch or wrapping up the story.
Mini Series like Black Bird, Chernobyl, True Detective… They’re amazing!
That and writing goes to shit once an idea has been dredged far enough.
Even the good stuff sucks after seven + years, and there’s usually a drop off before that.
I would say it is number of episodes more than just years, as a show with 20+ episodes per year will run out of the same number of ideas twice as fast as 10 per year, and the latter has more time available to think up and refine ideas.
I would say long running shows should be the exception to the rule, and all those shows that drug themselves out for whatever the syndication minimum was are the best examples moat things having a limited lifespan. Plus the number of years tends to lead to staff turnover and the people writing season 7 are most likely not the same as the ones who made the show successful in the first place.
As I’ve gotten older, I’ve come to appreciate shows that do a tight story in six to eight episodes. Many shows with 16-24 episodes per seasons always add in filler episodes that only need to exist to sell more ads over the course of the season. And shows that drag on season after season eventually lose the plot.
Remember Lost? One hundred and twenty-one episodes only to drop entire plot lines, mysteries, etc.
I really wish I could get back the time I spent watching Lost. What a waste… I was young and didn’t know any better
