Hi everyone! Since I was absolutely fucked by Skiff (thank fuck I didn’t pay for it) I’m looking for a new email provider :) I’m not sure I like how proton is transforming into a full on suit, I only need email. Any other recommendations or is proton my only choice really?

    • Footnote2669OP
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s not about “using an underdog”, I just like “do one thing and do it well” philosophy you know. I don’t need drives, calendars, vpn, password manager, in one thing. I want a simple email provider that’s it.

      Yeah skiff wasn’t like that but it seemed not too push it as much, just “hey it’s there you can use it” not full on products. Maybe I’m just being stupid about it idk

      • Atemu
        link
        fedilink
        219 months ago

        You can simply ignore all of these other features. Proton offers an email-only plan.

        • Footnote2669OP
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          True… People also recommend having your own domain so I can switch easily in the future. Having my surname seems a bit… un-privacy-like lol Any recommendations for that?

          • @Aachen
            link
            119 months ago

            Paid subscription of Proton bundles SimpleLogin, an email aliasing service. So you can have your personal email with your surname, and when you want to sign up to some shady corpo site, you give them a randomly generated email address using SimpleLogin. All emails sent to that alias email will be automatically forwarded to your personal email. You can then disable the alias email anytime and stop receiving emails.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            69 months ago

            I have both, a personal domain with my name and also an anonymous generic domain. I use the anonymous one for 90+% of my online stuff, and use a random unique address for every service (you can set up a wildcard in proton, so *@domain.org lands in the same inbox). I would recommend that for two reasons: if you own your anonymous domain you can move your mailprovider anytime (as opposed to using some email masking service), using unique addresses for every service enables you to easily figure out which one leaked your address if you start getting spam. Just make sure to use a generic name for the domain and dont get an exotic TLD (just get a .com .org or something). Some of the non traditional TLDs may negatively impact your spam scores, and its easy to find a .com or .org when you can literally choose any domain name you want.

    • @TCB13
      link
      English
      69 months ago

      Proton = No SMTP/IMAP support.

      • @Tinnitus
        link
        39 months ago

        You can use Proton Mail Bridge to set up SMTP/IMAP with your email app of choice. Obviously, you’re still stuck with using the bridge app on your device in order to get it working.

        • @TCB13
          link
          English
          -39 months ago

          Waiting for the day their business team devices the bridge is too much freedom you should get all locked-in.

          • @Tinnitus
            link
            29 months ago

            If that were to happen, nothing is stopping users from exporting their emails elsewhere.

            • @TCB13
              link
              English
              -49 months ago

              If that were to happen, nothing is stopping users from exporting their emails elsewhere.

              Yet. You’re delusional, nothing is stopping people at gmail to move to another providers, yet they stay. And trust me gmail has a much better export and supports IMAP.

              • @Tinnitus
                link
                69 months ago

                So your privacy-focused email provider recommendation is Gmail?

                • @TCB13
                  link
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Obviously not, but just don’t push proton. They’re a company that resorts to predatory tactics and has zero respect for their users.

                  For what’s worth Lavabit (back before Snowden) had much higher standards than Proton when it comes to privacy and still supported open protocols like IMAP and SMTP. What Proton is doing is pushing for vendor lock-in at any possible point so you’re stuck with what they deem acceptable because it’s easier for them to build a service this way and makes more sense from a business / customer retention perspective.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        They support IMAP though their bridge but you will have to be on a paid plan.

        The free plan is pretty terrible anyways so if you actually want to use proton you will have to pay.

        • @TCB13
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          Yes and you can’t run a bridge on anything and they might discontinue it at any time and you’ll become hostage. So much for self-hosting, independence and open-source solutions.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Yes and you can’t run a bridge on anything

            You can run the bridge on Windows, Linux and macOS. I wish that they had an Android app but I suspect that the aggressive power management on Android might make it a lot harder to implement in a nice way.

            they might discontinue it at any time and you’ll become hostage.

            There is absolutely no indication that that will happen. Remember that only the paid plans have IMAP and Proton is essentially held hostage by their subscribers since they are their only income source. Their community would be very angry if they dropped support.

            So much for self-hosting, independence and open-source solutions.

            This has nothing to do with self-hosting. You are literally paying someone for hosting your email.

            I agree that the lack of normal IMAP support is annoying. But it’s a side effect to their encryption which is a good thing.

            And it’s not like proton is alone with this problem.

            Tota doesn’t even seem to have a bridge app. Fastmail changes extra for IMAP.

    • voxel
      link
      fedilink
      -59 months ago

      proton requires them to use their software and adds a footer with protonmail ads to all of your emails without an option to disable it without paying up

        • voxel
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          yes but they shouldn’t be hiding that fact deep in the settings
          also I don’t care about encryption and stuff if it prevents me from using my favorite mail client without installing their bridge software

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        Tiếng Việt
        19 months ago

        Ads are harmless. The harmful things is JavaScript.

        requires them to use their software

        And their software doesn’t even have an option to display HTML messages as it is plain text messages.

        • voxel
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          by software i mean the imap bridge, but i agree that the official client is pretty bad too

  • bugsmith
    link
    fedilink
    289 months ago

    Another vote here for Fastmail. I also like Posteo, Mailbox and mxroute, but these are not as fully featured - which may be perfect for you if you’re after email only. What I really like about Fastmail is that on top of being a customer-focused business (rather than a customer is the product business), they offer a really snappy web interface with excellent search - and they are extremely compliant with email standards, building everything on JMAP.

    I do not like Proton or Tutanota. I have used both, including using Proton as my main email account for the past two years. I do believe they are probably the best when it comes to encryption and privacy standards, but for me it’s at far too much cost. Encrypted email is almost pointless - the moment you email someone who isn’t using a Proton (or PGP encryption), then the encryption is lost. Or even if they just forward an email to someone outside your chain. I would argue that if you need to send a message to someone with enough sensitivity to require this level of encryption, email is the wrong choice of protocol.

    For all that Proton offer, it results in broken email standard compliance, awful search capability and reliance on bridge software or being limited to their WebUI and apps. And it’s a shame, because I really like the company and their mission.

  • @solrize
    link
    209 months ago

    I’m happy with fastmail. Remember that must people you email are probably on Google (Gmail) so there is only so much you can accomplish in terms of email privacy whatever you do.

  • @totallynotarobot
    link
    14
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    What’s your objection to Proton? You don’t have to use any of the other products, and the free tier is perfectly usable last I checked (granted many years ago). Not sure what your concern is

    Edit: downvoting without replying doesn’t tell us what the concern is. Y’all weird

  • RachelRodent
    link
    fedilink
    119 months ago

    I 💜 Protonmail. I generally like proton as a company.This video has really gained my trust for them as a privacy focussed services provider.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    119 months ago

    Let me recommend Migadu, as email privacy is kind of a difficult topic. They offer complete email freedom for a very reasonable price; $20 ($10 for students) a year. They explain my main reasoning why I would avoid Proton:

    When an email provider rations email address of your own domain name-space at a fee, they are asking you to hand them over control of your name-space. There is zero cost associated with additional email addresses and it is time you learn about it.

    When email provider does not offer you standard email protocols that work with standard email clients, they want to lock you in for good. You are tied to using the dedicated applications offered by provider. The freedom of using a better or more suitable application is taken away from you. Protocols were standardized for a reason and today there are hundreds of email clients built for users with different needs.

    When email provider alters messages data in non-standard format, they deny you data portability and with it freedom of changing providers.

    Email is a collective effort of messaging interoperability. It is built around open, public standards and runs mostly on open source software maintained by folks believing in an open Internet, privacy and personal freedoms. Let’s not give away our freedoms for some Kool-Aid.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    89 months ago

    I recently switched to skiff from proton as the skiff’s free tier is offering what proton’s mail plus plan. And now they are shutting down their services.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      Their free tier storage offering was amazing. I honestly couldn’t see how they could offer so much for free. I was very tempted at the time but chose proton. Although I think I may move to Fastmail when my renewal is due.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        I honestly couldn’t see how they could offer so much for free

        We just saw that it wasn’t profitable and the business plan was to find an exit strategy via acquisition

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    89 months ago

    Plus one for Proton, I don’t use their password manager, but their other products I’ve been using and been pleased with. I consider it well worth the cost.

  • ɐɥO
    link
    fedilink
    79 months ago

    Been using Tuta for a few years and its great. Can use catch-all with my own Domain