After Donald J. Trump suggested he had threatened to encourage Russia to attack “delinquent” NATO allies, the response among many Republican officials has struck three themes — expressions of support, gaze aversion or even cheerful indifference.

Republican Party elites have become so practiced at deflecting even Mr. Trump’s most outrageous statements that they quickly batted this one away. Mr. Trump, the party’s likely presidential nominee, had claimed at a Saturday rally in South Carolina that he once threatened a NATO government to meet its financial commitments — or else he would encourage Russia to “do whatever the hell they want” to that country.

Archive

  • @Coach
    link
    English
    2910 months ago

    A vote for R is a vote for Russia.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1910 months ago

    Wow. If this bag of shit gets magically “elected” again I hope that all the rest of NATO straight up nukes the fuck out of the US ASAP because we clearly do NOT deserve a second chance. I say this as a proud but disappointed US citizen.

    • @RGB3x3
      link
      English
      1710 months ago

      I’d say the 78% of the population that didn’t vote for Trump deserves to keep living.

      Yes, in 2020, only 22% of the population voted for Trump. And yes, that does include children and those ineligible to vote, but I think it’s worthwhile pointing out that the US is very much under minority rule. Because those same people voted for the Republicans in Congress.

      • @CitizenKong
        link
        22
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        As a sidenote, only 33 percent of Germans actually voted for Hitler. He still managed to destroy democracy.

        A minority is absolutely dangerous as long as the majority stays silent.

        • @Boddhisatva
          link
          410 months ago

          Or put another way, “ Bad men need noth­ing more to com­pass their ends, than that good men should look on and do noth­ing." - John Stewart Mill

  • @twistypencil
    link
    710 months ago

    What are they being asked? Because if it is, how can you justify supporting a insane lunatic for president over a forgetful one…?

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    510 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    After Donald J. Trump suggested he had threatened to encourage Russia to attack “delinquent” NATO allies, the response among many Republican officials has struck three themes — expressions of support, gaze aversion or even cheerful indifference.

    Mr. Trump, the party’s likely presidential nominee, had claimed at a Saturday rally in South Carolina that he once threatened a NATO government to meet its financial commitments — or else he would encourage Russia to “do whatever the hell they want” to that country.

    And where Mr. Trump might land on a commitment to Ukraine has, for the international community and foreign-policy experts, become something of a stand-in for how he will approach NATO, America’s most important military alliance, in any potential second term.

    As a wingman of the late Republican hawk and war hero Senator John McCain of Arizona, Mr. Graham traveled the country warning anyone who would listen about the dangers of Mr. Trump.

    “NATO countries that don’t spend enough on defense, like Germany, are already encouraging Russian aggression and President Trump is simply ringing the warning bell,” Mr. Cotton said in an interview.

    Jason Miller, a senior adviser to Mr. Trump’s campaign, when asked to explain the former president’s statements — including whether it was an invitation for new aggression from Russia — did not directly address the question.


    The original article contains 1,643 words, the summary contains 219 words. Saved 87%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!