• Deceptichum
    link
    fedilink
    598 months ago

    I wonder if Taiwan is looking into these boat-drones considering their successes. Could be extremely useful in keeping any Chinese ships from ever landing.

    • Skua
      link
      fedilink
      648 months ago

      Every single military in the world will be watching the usage of all sorts of drones in this conflict. Even if you’re America or China you need to learn how to defeat them cost-effectively

      • Jaytreeman
        link
        fedilink
        388 months ago

        The US just cancelled a major helicopter project because drones do the job cheaper

        • Buelldozer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          148 months ago

          Dunno why you were downvoted, you’re absolutely correct and I linked to it up above before I saw your comment.

          • Jaytreeman
            link
            fedilink
            68 months ago

            I’m pretty opinionated, and some of them aren’t popular. I’m fairly certain I get a few accounts down voting everything I put out there.
            Good news, is that I see evidence from other instances, but not a lot on my home.

      • @Shard
        link
        English
        298 months ago

        Drones are becoming a huge game changer.

        Even simple unarmed $300 drones with an IR camera are proving to be extremely effective. The level of live battlefield information and situational awareness they are bringing to commanders on the ground is at least equivalent to what a platoon of recon troops can offer.

        Next up are the drones capable of carrying light loads like air dropped grenades or explosives than can take our expensive vehicles like aircraft. The return on investment for these systems are insane.

        • Buelldozer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          20
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Drones are becoming a huge game changer.

          The US Army literally just cancelled its FARA Helicopter program because of drones.

          ““We are learning from the battlefield – especially Ukraine – that aerial reconnaissance has fundamentally changed,” Army Chief of Staff General Randy George said in a press release.”

          • @Shard
            link
            English
            38 months ago

            The US does not like attack helis or something. The Comanche was a cool looking heli that was cancelled back in the day.

            To this day we’re still operating Apaches, a design first built in 1975.

            • @guacupado
              link
              English
              78 months ago

              Because we don’t need multiple versions of helicopters to do the same thing. Most of our recent Apache use is against people using AKs and RPGs then running into caves - ironically enough, probably the same level as its main use-case in 1975.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              68 months ago

              But attack helis just seem so fragile. They’re relatively easy targets and don’t add all that much extra. Transport heli’s are way more useful. Hell, even in civilization games heli’s are weak.

          • @NotMyOldRedditName
            link
            English
            18 months ago

            Should send the money saved to Ukraine, money better spent on them in the end, it saved them from spending more money on that instead.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 months ago

        For few hundred $ you get capability that formerly was only provided by ATGMs, and it’s several times lighter as well, not to mention increased situational awareness. Every military worth their salt will have to study it and countermeasures

          • Cosmic Cleric
            link
            English
            28 months ago

            The drone wars have begun

            If any one single sentence ever needed to be Yodafied, it would be this one.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          58 months ago

          for comparison Stugna-P costs $20k per missile, entire system is 100kg but in return it gets to target much faster and has enough penetration to drill through frontal armour of most tanks, basically guaranteeing mission kill in single hit. drones get to the target in minutes, not seconds and have to find weak spots, but greater maneuverability allows for this

          • @The_v
            link
            English
            58 months ago

            I think drones overwhelming advantage is the range and terrain they are effective in. The ability to find and destroy a target that is moving behind cover is a huge advantage.

            How many videos have we seen of assaults moving up behind a tree line for cover. Artillery can stop these but hitting a moving target from miles away takes a lot of shells. Air support can take them out but they are vulnerable on today’s battlefield. Weapons like the Stugna-P require line-of-sight on the ground so they have to let them get closer.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              Artillery can get quite effective if you have something like BONUS or Smart155 that will find and kill vehicles for you

      • Deceptichum
        link
        fedilink
        38 months ago

        Especially considering war is always a battle between offence and defence and we’ve been in a defence stage for so long with modern armoured vehicles.

      • @Chocrates
        link
        English
        18 months ago

        For sure, hasnt the whole world learned that heavy expensive vehicles can be countered by relatively cheap munitions?
        Even without air superiority Ukraine has made MBT’s basically useless.

        • Skua
          link
          fedilink
          38 months ago

          To be fair, the fact that so many MBTs are still being lost suggests that they are still useful enough to be used. However, some militaries have been trialled lasers as a sort of lightweight CIWS to protect such vehicles from the likes of incoming missiles, and while that’s expensive to add on in the first place the cost per shot is virtually nothing. Turkiye has supposedly already tried one out in live combat, and against UAVs no less

      • @guacupado
        link
        English
        128 months ago

        Actually fewer steps. You don’t need an entire ship or submarine.

    • Justas🇱🇹
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 months ago

      It’s all fun and war games until an entire flotilla of 和平-dec shows up.

  • @TheJims
    link
    English
    418 months ago

    Ukraines artificial reef program is coming along nicely

  • @avater
    link
    English
    25
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    ♫ Under the sea, under the sea ♫

    ♫ Darling, it’s better down where it’s wetter ♫

    ♫ Take it from me ♫

  • @aeronmelon
    link
    English
    198 months ago

    Don’t think of it as Russia losing another ship. Think of it as Ukraine helping Russia launch a new submarine. :)

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      178 months ago

      They have the world’s largest submarine fleet!

      And they’re so advanced, they don’t even need to surface for the crew!

  • The Snark Urge
    link
    English
    178 months ago

    So, exactly the kind of ship Russia would need to retake Crimea. Interdasting

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      138 months ago

      Also used for transport of cargo. Whew russians never had problems with logistics, right?

    • @NotMyOldRedditName
      link
      English
      28 months ago

      I think I read there’s 3 more to go, and then there’s the bridge. With those 4 things gone, it’ll be pretty isolating.