• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    289 months ago

    Carbon capture is a scam. We need to reduce carbon emissions. Capturing will never be an economical way of stopping climate catastrophe.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      99 months ago

      I suspect there will be a point where economics don’t matter anymore and we don’t have a choice.

      • jadero
        link
        fedilink
        69 months ago

        I agree, but until we’re a lot closer to zero carbon emissions than we are now, capture technology should be treated as research. Prototypes, even proof of scalability prototypes are fine, but they should not be sucking resources from emission reduction or, worse, trying to replace emission reduction.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          49 months ago

          100%! But the research is still vital, and we should be doing more of it while being way more aggressive about carbon reduction.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          I disagree only on a technicality - economics still matter for decision making, in the minds of people who are in power of making those decisions. Otherwise yeah, things are past the point of no return. Mitigation is all we can hope to do I think.

    • @captainlezbian
      link
      49 months ago

      Short term yes, but the long carbon cycle is where we should be looking because otherwise we’re an accident away from right back here

    • @ikidd
      link
      English
      19 months ago

      Grassland and pasture captures more.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        Hard to build a lasting house out of grass and that’s the beauty of wood, you grow it, it captures carbon, you cut it to build a house and it’s now stable for the foreseeable future.