Use Codeberg ;)

    • Aatube
      link
      fedilink
      149 months ago

      (note, the GitLab Enterprise Edition, which is provided to the public on gitlab.com, is (like GitHub) trade-secret, proprietary, vendor-lock-in software)

      Isn’t EE source-available but proprietary? Plus if you just use the free tier you’re not using any enterprise features

    • @SidewaysHighways
      link
      39 months ago

      Will things like setting up a “stack” in portainer on docker be able to use the github alternatives like codeberg? or will those kinds of things need to be rebuilt?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        They should™ work with any git repo hosted by any method right down to running git-http-backend as a CGI script I would have thought.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Anyone got a commmand line tool change all my stuff? Because if I have to do change all the remotes all the time, for dozens of projects I’m going to lose my mind.

      Also the migration on gitlab/codeberg looked like an amount of effort that doesn’t round down to zero.

  • @random9
    link
    489 months ago

    I thought this was going to be a FOSS discussion, comparing GitHub and it’s current owner - Microsoft - to the ethics of other hosting services like codeberg.org or something.

    Then I saw where this was posted.

      • @random9
        link
        289 months ago

        A lot of people associated with Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) have major objections to GitHub. Here’s one summary: https://sfconservancy.org/GiveUpGitHub/

        But the TLDR; version is roughly:

        • Your source hosted on GitHub is being used to train AI, and you are possibly giving up rights to algorithms you may have written (IANAL, and AI training is a fuzzy topic at the moment)
        • GitHub itself is proprietary, closed-source software, while they claim to be pro-FOSS. Aside from not being in the spirit of things, closed-source means you also don’t know what happens with your code/data once up upload it.
        • Microsoft has a history of being anti-FOSS, while some people will say it’s been changing, I think many are still rightfully concerned what their future decisions regarding GitHub might be, especially if they are a near-monopoly.

        Alternative do exist, and some like codeberg.org are specifically open sourced, and pro-open source, so many people are pushing to move hosting away from GitHub and onto other options.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          Thanks for explaining it in such good detail but I was referring to your last sentence. I’m new to lemmy and I’m still looking for good communities and blocking the bad ones. I apologise for not being clear enough in the first reply.

          • @random9
            link
            49 months ago

            Oh - this isn’t a bad community, that isn’t what I meant by my last sentence - this is just a place for memes and jokes more than serious discussion, hence my expectation of a serious discussion was subverted. But programmer humor is still a great place.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        119 months ago

        The previous Microsoft’s CEO truly hates FOSS, famously calling it cancer. Then the next CEO reversed Microsoft’s stance on FOSS, acquiring the largest FOSS collaboration site. Naturally, many view this move with suspicion since Microsoft has a history of embracing something only to extinguish it later.

      • @random9
        link
        29 months ago

        Yes, I normally speak english good, but your corect to, i make a typo then.

  • @random9
    link
    379 months ago

    Is this copypasta yet?

    I DONT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT THE CODE!! WHY IS THERE CODE? JUST MAKE A FUCKING EXE FILE AND GIVE IT TO ME.

    who needs code, when all we need is exe files.

      • Ethan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        Fuck that, I don’t trust executables unless they’re signed, downloaded securely (e.g. HTTPS), and I trust the source I downloaded them from. Anything else might as well be a virus. If I can’t find a signed binary from a trustworthy source, I’m either not using it or I’m going to build it myself (after skimming through the code).

  • @anamethatisnt
    link
    259 months ago

    I’m looking forward to the Forgejo Federation to be completed.
    It will be nice to not have to choose between self hosting your repository and having your repository discoverable.

    Is forge federation ready to be used by developers around the world? Not yet.
    But the first Forgejo release with native federation implementation based on ForgeFed and F3 is expected next year.

    Info from June 2023: https://forgefriends.org/blog/2023/06/21/2023-06-state-forge-federation/

  • blargerer
    link
    fedilink
    189 months ago

    Jokes on you, I just never stopped using SVN out of laziness.

    • DacoTaco
      link
      69 months ago

      Jokes on me for saying github != git though

      • @itsnotits
        link
        49 months ago

        Joke’s* on me

        (Short for “The joke is on me”.)

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      everyone knows the proper place for code is stuffing it into a trunk

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        109 months ago

        I just store mine in memory (meat memory, not the computer stuff). If someone wants the source code I just tell them. Version control by oral tradition.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          49 months ago

          You joke, but that’s how a lot of the stuff I work on is documented. Passed along from one developer to the next - legends, really.

    • @itsnotits
      link
      29 months ago

      Joke’s* on you

      (Short for “The joke is on you”.)

    • @random9
      link
      239 months ago

      Fun fact, Linus has said that he has named both of the major pieces of software he has authored after himself - Linux and Git.

      Git is a somewhat old British slang insult for someone stupid/childish.

      So GitHub is then … a hub of gits.

      • @marcos
        link
        149 months ago

        If you look at the issues discussion of any popular project there…

        I guess it’s the right name.

  • @LemmyIsFantastic
    link
    109 months ago

    I get this is a meme, but the most successful projects are the ones that quickly get you running and are supportive to new users. I’ll get off my soapbox.

    • sagOP
      link
      fedilink
      19 months ago

      What do you mean? Real Programmer use Zip file to share source code.

  • @Ziglin
    link
    28 months ago

    I agree with GitHub being bad, but the meme’s content is worse and I’m afraid that there are people who agree with it. I don’t like GitHub or Microsoft but since I get their stuff for free I do use but I’d love to use something that’s open and supports git properly.

  • @RampantParanoia2365
    link
    -69 months ago

    I’m sorry, you were saying something about mental derangement after posting this thing? Jesus.

    • @gsfraley
      link
      179 months ago

      It’s a pretty popular meme format, it’s not serious