• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      It won’t be long before they are using it for body cavity searches and you will appreciate the design.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    99 months ago

    So this $21,000 rented thing just checks out door alarms when a door is opened by accident? And it only moves at 3 mph? And they think that the person who opened the door will still be standing there when it arrives?

    Why on god’s green earth don’t they just aim a normal security camera at the door and call it a day?

    • @glimse
      link
      49 months ago

      That’s what they say it’s for. I’m sure its cameras and sensors won’t be turned off between alarm checks

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        Even so, airports are already heavily monitored. I don’t see how it is any more or less invasive than the security cameras and TSA screening that is already in place.

        This seems like a very expensive way to make the robotic equivalent of a fat security guard on patrol.

        • @glimse
          link
          19 months ago

          Each has their strengths so why not both?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            59 months ago

            Because even a fat security guard can go faster than 3 mph, and you don’t need heat vision to see who opened a door.

  • @apfelwoiSchoppen
    link
    59 months ago

    Seems like the first step to some terrifying Cyberdyne Systems dystopia.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    An autonomous robot is due to become the latest addition to San Antonio international airport’s security apparatus.

    The robot, which weighs 420lb, stands at 5ft 4in and travels at 3 miles per hour, is expected to make its appearance at the airport in the next two months, according to local reports.

    Jalen McKee-Rodriguez, a council member who represents San Antonio’s second district and who voted against the contract, told Saenz: “It’s not your intention to create a space where surveillance is happening … But if the robot has the ability to collect data and information and transmit that, that possibility remains.

    Meanwhile, Teri Castillo, a council member who represents the city’s fifth district and who also voted against the deal, asked Saenz whether the robot would replace any airport employees.

    At the time of its debut, the New York City mayor, Eric Adams, hailed the robot, saying: “Eventually, this is going to be part of the fabric of our subway system.”

    However, the pilot program came to an end earlier this month, with a spokesperson for Adams telling the New York Times: “The Adams administration is constantly exploring innovative technologies that can advance the work we’ve done to bring down crime and keep New Yorkers safe, while maximizing the use of taxpayer dollars.”


    The original article contains 515 words, the summary contains 213 words. Saved 59%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!