Researchers presented new techniques to fight sophisticated hacking at a tech conference. Here are the highlights:

Self-destruct chips:

  • A team from Vermont and Marvell created chips with unique fingerprints that can destroy themselves (through increased voltage) if tampered with. This prevents both counterfeiting and unauthorized access to information.
  • Probe detection: Columbia and Intel researchers developed a circuit that detects probes attached to a circuit board, preventing hackers from gaining physical control of a system.
  • Signal Obscuring: Researchers from Texas and Intel created a method to hide a chip’s power and electromagnetic signals, making it harder for attackers to steal information.

These innovations could improve chip security and save businesses billions from chip counterfeiting.

Comments

NGL. After I saw “Self-destruct chips”, I was just overwhelmed by Mission Impossible theme song.

https://youtu.be/PeKW0stTThk

  • @ThrowawaySobriquet
    link
    English
    848 months ago

    Posit: Self-destructing chips to protect infosec and enforce digital sovereignty

    Practice: Self-destructing chips to protect copyright and enforce EULA

    • @SlopppyEngineer
      link
      English
      15
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      HP is probably first. Don’t pay the subscription for their printing service, self destruct printer and inkt cartridges.

      • @CaptPretentious
        link
        English
        98 months ago

        Roku seems like a good contender too from the sound of it. Probably all ‘smart’ TVs

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      78 months ago

      Warning: Piracy detected… Please view this advertisement to continue… Please drink verification to avoid lock.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    388 months ago

    “Billions lost to counterfeit chips” yeah all those garage fabs cranking out fake 4090s are the REAL problem in the market

    This will be used for enforcing subscriptions on enterprise gear, I promise.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      If these aren’t too costly to implement and game consoles continue to use specialized hardware, this could be used to seriously hamper attempts at reverse engineering for modchips and similar things.

      It also could be disasterous for right to repair, and against hobbists keeping old hardware running by using third party modifications decades after the end of a product’s life.

      I’d also question how much of chip design “piracy” is actually done by reverse engineering nowadays vs corporate espionage or leaks of internal design docs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        Reverse engineering of hardware is quickly becoming too complex for non-machine-assisted workflows. I’d imagine this type of destructive chip really only makes sense cryptology modules, but unless a designer can also manufacture the chip in-house or otherwise guarantee against supply chain attacks, this is a half measure.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    288 months ago

    Sooo, efuses?

    If this is implemented it is only a matter of time before it is used by hackers to hold the hardware of a company/government hostage with new ransomwares

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    sounds like it closes a data theft vector but opens one hell of a ddos DoS vector in its place.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      Of a permanent DoS, like frying a chip remotely. Things which were urban legends in my childhood are being made reality.

      I don’t think greed’s the problem, it’s necessary for survival of a society. But like many other necessary things it should be contained, and right now it really isn’t.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      Still, having this option can’t be a bad thing. Ultimately it’s an engineer (or PM I suppose) that decides to use this chip based on the product requirements.

      Sometimes you want to fail closed, or purposefully fail catastrophically if some constraints aren’t met.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      It can be used for good things like making ATM pin pads even more tamper resistant, but I guarantee it will be prevent people from repairing any hardware they “buy” instead.

  • @Treczoks
    link
    English
    48 months ago

    There are already self destructing harddisks. They are used in military systems and have a thermite package.

  • @cholesterol
    link
    English
    38 months ago

    Now that there is an old Dell Inspiron. I had one with that shell ca. 2006.