• Trump “will not give a penny” more to Ukraine if he becomes president, Hungary’s prime minister said.
  • That’s how Trump plans to end the war, Viktor Orbán, who met Trump at Mar-a-Lago, said.
  • The Trump campaign has not said whether the pair discussed Ukraine during the visit.
  • @foggy
    link
    English
    1349 months ago

    Lmao of course Putin’s allies know trumps plans.

    They are Putin’s plans.

    If we genuinely allow this man to run for president and evade jail time, we should genuinely start building guillotines.

    • InfiniteGlitch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      509 months ago

      I don’t live in US but I’m immensely surprised he can still run for President with all the things going on with him.

      Thought by now he would’ve been sent to jail/prison.

      • Poggervania
        link
        fedilink
        299 months ago

        Unfortunately, a lot of our government is crooked as hell and Trump was basically able to put people that align with him into certain positions, such as two of the supreme justices that oversee very high profile cases such as the one where Trump argued presidents should have immunity from crimes done during presidency.

        Then you compound that with the actual literal fascist party that is the Republican party who only care about lining their pockets with money and being ok with corporations running things, and you get the shitshow that is the US today where citizens will actually support a fascist insurrectionist who clearly wants to align himself more with Russia and potentially even China, and says things such as “I will be a dictator for one day” and “the US should pull out of NATO”.

        I fear for this country and genuinely am glad I don’t live in the mainland USA - and I wouldn’t be too opposed to having my state go back to being a British Territory if Trump gets elected again.

      • @Zron
        link
        English
        229 months ago

        Unfortunately the US has basically been running on the polite fiction that people who want to be leaders will be good leaders and behave like rational human beings.

        So when someone who has no good intentions and is not rational got into power, we learned that a lot of things we thought of as laws were really just habits.

        And as much as it sucks, it’s actually sensible that trump can run until he’s been proven guilty. Otherwise a wannabe dictator could just drown the opposition in frivolous lawsuits and bar them from running because of the suspicion of crime.

        Don’t get me wrong, I think trump is guilty as sin and is a danger to our democracy. But, we need to be careful how we respond to this, or it could be worse when the next maniac gets into power and starts banning people from running because all of his opponents are suddenly under investigation for tax irregularities or littering.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          79 months ago

          He was found guilty of insurrection in a state court. So that he can’t run for president. But then the federal supreme court decided that this particular provision of the constitution is not self executing. And the Congress must pass a law to find Trump ineligible to run. They didn’t comment on the insurrection part.

          So Trump has been found guilty of insurrection and he can still run for president.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Lmao of course Putin’s allies know trumps plans.

      To be fair, you could stop a random person on the streets of America of either major political party and ask them if Trump wins will he give any money to Ukraine and you won’t get a single different answer.

      You don’t exactly need an inside line to get this kind of hot tip.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    96
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    To be more clear, if Trump manages to capture the presidency, I fully expect him to withdraw the US from NATO.

    And the US leaving NATO would be absolutely, categorically, inarguably, and apocalyptically stupid.

      • @Wrench
        link
        English
        79 months ago

        He never intended to lose (or to be removed after rejecting a loss), so there was no rush

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        No, which is why it didn’t happen in his first term. Lots of people threw sand in the gears to slow that effort down.

        It’s just that if he gets in again, he’s openly said he’s going to fire a shitload of people all over the government and replace them with Trump loyalists (regardless of whether or not it’s legal), so it will probably actually happen if he captures the presidency again.

        • @mirtuevagnet
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Relaxing people for family members and other loyalist is fair game in an autocracy.

      • Jaysyn
        link
        fedilink
        69 months ago

        Nope, but he can fuck NATO over internally well enough.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -39 months ago

      The money that runs this country wouldn’t stand for the level of disruption that’d cause to the ongoing grift to slow/stop. Same why we likely won’t ever crash out on the deficit, the rating downgrade scared them so bad the Republicans made a deal ASAP last time

      What’s terrifying is if the money decides to go in and join in the ‘creative destruction’ via another Business Plot and co-opts authoritarianism

    • Neuromancer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -229 months ago

      I am not sure why people say that when Trump said, if they didn’t honor their commitments, we would leave.

      Since the invasion, most countries have finally stepped up to pair their obligation. Funny how Trump was right.

      • RubberDuck
        link
        English
        149 months ago

        No he wasn’t. His comments are a self fulfilling prophecy. If an alliance that is strong because they are united under the US umbrella has the potential leader of said alliance state he no longer feels he needs to back his allies… they must.

        But:

        • The 2% is a guideline not a rule
        • They got to pay… who? The defence industry… it’s not a membership fee.
        • many countries where already investing more
        • spending more on defense is not simple, procurement takes yeeeaaars… so countries that started ramp up projects years ago are now in the position to actually spend more.
        • The only time NATO needed to openly wage war was in defence of the US. So the commitment of the rest of NATO is fact, the US’s isn’t.
        • Neuromancer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -249 months ago

          So the commitment of the rest of NATO is fact, the US’s isn’t. Well, if that is the way you feel, then the United States should just leave NATO. If having the largest Army in the world and saving Europe in two wars isn’t proof of commitment, then we should just sit the next one out. It sounds like we are not wanted or needed.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            129 months ago

            Good job entirely (and, I think, intentionally) misinterpreting the whole fuckin’ context of the situation.

            • ArxCyberwolf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              119 months ago

              Check out what community they moderate, it’s very telling.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                89 months ago

                I just miss the era when the vast majority of Americans were on the same page regarding potentially dangerous geopolitical crap. Politics used to end at the water’s edge for the most part, but not anymore.

                • ArxCyberwolf
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  79 months ago

                  Everyone now just chooses a “side” and blindly defends it, no matter how wrong it is. There is zero room for nuance. It’s exhausting to talk to people like Wintermute who will ignore all evidence that is contrary to their opinions and will resort to bad faith arguments every single time. And then blindly accuse othet people of doing the same when called out.

                  Politics have gone to hell and we’re all worse off for it.

            • Neuromancer
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -139 months ago

              Be more clear in your point. I get you don’t like Trump but what he said was true.

              Now everyone is scurrying because he was right.

              Hate the man as much as you want but at the end of the day, he was right.

              You fight a war with the Army you have, not the one you can build in the next five years. Europe has not taken their defense seriously, and it isn’t our job to spend our money to defend Europe. It is our job to help in their defense.

              Putin was a wakeup call to Europe and hopefully they leaned you always need to be prepared for war.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                119 months ago

                Ok, sure, let’s play your game.

                Let’s say Trump gets in, and the US fucks off from NATO. What then?

                Outline the ramifications for me. I have a pretty concrete idea of what the fallout would be, but I want you to tell me what you think would happen, in your own words.

          • RubberDuck
            link
            English
            5
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Ah the “Fine, I’ll takey ball and go home” arguement.

            Referring to WW2 that was self preservation as much as anything else, and it is not like they got poorer from it. The US made bank after WW2.

            The US called upon NATO after September 9th and everyone came. So that also shows something, but I guess that does not count.

            And now the US is gearing up for their “inevitable” conflict with China. But for that they will need their allies too. So by showing your allies you are unreliable, countries might start making other choices. You know, self preservation.

            • Neuromancer
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -79 months ago

              Ww2 was because Japan attacked the United States and in brilliant move, Germany declared war.

              If we go to war with China, we don’t need the help of others. They need our help.

              It’s why Australia is asking for us to build bases. They know they can’t take China.

              Japan at least is taking it seriously and arming up for war. They beat China once

              • RubberDuck
                link
                English
                59 months ago

                American exceptionalism at its finest.

                • Neuromancer
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -79 months ago

                  We are exceptional. We are the only real super power in the world. I am not ashamed of my country. We need to the beacon of the world and sadly we’ve let that falter. We need another Reagan to get us back on track

                • Neuromancer
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -29 months ago

                  Yeah people dying is just like poke mon cards. Not wanting to eee kids to die is just like poke mon cards.

                  I have never seen a comment devalue human life in such trivial way.well done

  • @oDDmON
    link
    English
    519 months ago

    Yet another reason that odious orange toad should be denied a second term.

  • @nutsack
    link
    English
    449 months ago

    That’s a great way to encourage Russian election interference in his favor

  • MonsterMonster
    link
    English
    329 months ago

    This Trump, Orban, Putin triangle makes me think of the TV series The Handmaid’s Tale where the US slides into civil war and global isolation. Instead of the Sons Of Jacob you have Trump.

    Seriously, if Trump is besties with Orban and he beats Biden to the Whitehouse the US is heading for very dark times.

    • ConfusedPossum
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      The entire World is in a dire position with climate change and all that. The USA turning inwards to settle it’s culture war will have global ramifications. It’s already happening

  • @resetbypeer
    link
    English
    279 months ago

    Should the title not be “Putin’s ally Trump to end the Ukraine war is to totally cut off funding, says Putin’s closes (hopefully soon out of the EU and NATO) ally”

  • @SupraMario
    link
    English
    249 months ago

    Trump and the repubs are traitorous pieces of shit. I hope that orange turd has a massive heart attack as soon as possible, preferably before the election.

    Slava Ukraini!

  • IWantToFuckSpez
    link
    fedilink
    169 months ago

    Anyone who thinks the war will be over when Ukraine falls is a gullible idiot. The Ruskis will march straight to Moldova after the takeover of Ukraine.

    • admiralteal
      link
      fedilink
      129 months ago

      Every non-NATO state on the border will be targeted and incorporated either directly or by being turned into a loyal authoritarian state a la Belarus.

      And if the US leaves NATO, that undermines confidence in NATO. The alliance will fall. At that point, either the EU will have to step in and supplant it – in which case the US will no longer be even be PART of the mightiest diplomatic alliance in the world, much less influential in it – or else there’s no reason to think Russian aggression will stop endlessly escalating until all-out war between nuclear powers is on the table.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        Additionally, there is already a lot of discussion about nuclear proliferation. Some nations did not develop their own nuclear weapons because the US guaranteed for their security in exchange.

    • @Vash63
      link
      English
      49 months ago

      No no no you don’t understand. The war in the rest of Europe will be just beginning, but the war in Ukraine will be over.

  • theodewere
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    his plan for COVID was just ignoring that problem as well… i think he likes to hide from problems and so do all of his piggy supporters…

    everyone knows it’s time to invade Russia and give that regime the merciful death it’s asking for

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      As much as I’d like that regime to disappear, I wouldn’t go so far as to invade Russia. Putin’s nuclear sabre rattling is obviously bullshit when it comes to Ukraine, but backing them that far into the corner with an invasion is probably one of the few things that brings a real nuclear risk. I’d be more for the “measured” response of hunting down and eliminating any Russian assets found outside Russian borders, perpetually until the Russian people chose a leader who is capable of living in civilized society.

      • theodewere
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        the Russians talk a lot of shit, it’s time to put up or shut up

        • @Username02
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The Russians also committed a lot of heinous crimes. If you want to bet, place your bet on how many people will die in a nuclear fire, not will it happen or will it not.

  • @RampantParanoia2365
    link
    English
    119 months ago

    Someone please just shoot Trump in the fucking face with a high-powered…camera. Please.

  • @Rapidcreek
    link
    English
    49 months ago

    Infamy.

    As the CIA Director pointed out, we need to give arms to Ukraine at the very least to get Russia to the negotiations table. Otherwise, all we are going to see is a lot of dead Ukrainians and Russians.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In comments made to Hungarian news outlet M1, Orbán said Trump has detailed plans on how to end the war, Reuters reported.

    The Trump campaign’s statement about the meeting between Trump and Orbán didn’t mention Ukraine, saying only that the two men had discussed issues affecting their respective countries and the importance of strong border security.

    The campaign did not immediately respond to Business Insider’s request for comment, sent outside of working hours.

    Pro-Trump Republicans in Congress have also vocally opposed further aid to Ukraine, sending a bill with $60 billion earmarked for the country into limbo.

    He has also frequently expressed frustration with fellow NATO states and the scale of their contribution to collective defense.

    Trump has suggested that, under his leadership, the US would refuse to come to the aid of fellow NATO states that have not met the threshold, even saying that he would encourage Russia to attack them.


    The original article contains 403 words, the summary contains 152 words. Saved 62%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @harderian729
    link
    English
    -49 months ago

    I mean, it’s either that or more Ukrainians die.

    There is no chance they can win without foreign troops on the ground.

    • @zik
      link
      English
      49 months ago

      Given their genocide in Western Ukraine I’d say that letting Russia overrun the country will result in a lot of deaths.