I’ll be emailing the site admin… or some contact at the site, but, is there anything else that can be done to try to put pressure on these websites that tell me “you’re not getting the best experience… download Chrome.”?

I know Firefox has a “Report a broken site” feature, but, the site isn’t technically broken. They’re just telling me to switch browsers.

    • @javasux
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      What a privileged life to lead, where you aren’t forced to use certain websites by (e.g.) your student loan servicer, or your utility company

      • 7heo
        link
        fedilink
        48 months ago

        You are only forced by yourself. I regularly find myself ridiculed, ostracised, blocked, etc.; but I never find myself forced: in our western societies at least, nobody (outside of cops during demonstrations, but that is an entirely different topic) forces you to do anything. Instead, you are coerced.

        The thing with coercion is that it is always a tradeoff between a small immediate cost (that will either increase dramatically over time, or be compounded by another factor because of some non immediately obvious synergy) and a big immediate cost (that will however prevent the situation from devolving any further).

        Since most people aren’t intelligent enough to spontaneously interpolate the missing information, and understand the entirety of the situation they are enabling, they take the small immediate cost, only to find themselves fucked in the long run, act surprised_pikachu.gif, and argue that they could not have possibly seen it coming.

        The fact is that this lack of intelligence, while partly stemming from an unfair, abusive system, is still mostly on them: intelligence isn’t innate. Like strength, it is an ability that one develops and cultivates, and even though there are definitely genetic and environmental factors, they account for a small part of one’s overall agency in this regard.

        So, had they bothered to be honest with themselves and just checked that their comfort might very well have an unexpectedly disproportionate cost (especially after people like me would have warned them), they might have realised the importance of not giving in to the easiest “solution”.

        Case in point, in this instance, the website is either checking for the blink engine (which could be a technical requirement), the user agent (which would likely be borderline legal at best - at least in the EU, I dunno in other places), or just using JavaScript to probe the browser (beyond its engine). Depending on the situation, the course of action differs.

        In the first case, further investigation is required (as to why the blink engine is technically necessary, and if it is legitimate. Probably isn’t, modulo some additional development cost).

        In the second case, spoofing the user agent is a good practice, even if only for privacy purposes. However, pursuing a legal action (on the grounds of antitrust, complying with legally required accessibility, etc) is probably also a good thing to look into, or at the very least trying to find other people who have the problem, to try and organise a more permanent solution (like resisting the coercion as a group rather than as an individual).

        In the third case, the situation is most likely abusive, and while there might be some reasons for them to do this, I would definitely investigate the technical aspect and seek legal advice (same remarks as the previous point here).

        Either way, compliance is an invitation for bullies to continue bullying, so refusing to comply, or being difficult (slow, requiring as much work as possible on their end, etc), and implementing malicious compliance might be your best course of action. Use a virtual machine with chromium if you have to. Try to find a way to exhaust their server resources (and make it plausibility deniable, such as having as many open and hanging connexions as possible, submitting files in a loop, use fuzzing and pentesting tools, etc. Be sure to read the doc, not everything is legal). Make your documents as big as possible. Try to find bugs to make them unreadable, render only on specific systems (windows 98, etc). In office documents, use macros that exhaust resources. Etc.

        And as I said, find others, organise, unionise, and become hard to deal with. At the same time, report the issue as clearly as possible. If they fix it, make sure to stop the malicious compliance as immediately as possible.

        • @javasux
          link
          English
          0
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          So you’re telling me to stop paying my bills in protest of Google Chrome, because I’m not technically being forced to pay my bills

          • 7heo
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            You can also stop breathing in protest of people being mean to you, because you’re not technically forced to breathe. Grow up. This is not what I meant and you know it.

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    488 months ago

    Well, I submitted a “support” request:

    For whatever it’s worth - I’m disappointed to see that XXX is pushing for its customers to download Chrome rather than ensure that their website supports proper web standards. A website that supports web standards will work well on all browsers and will save you from trying to pressure your customers into changing their preferred browser.

    Thank you for your time (and, this is my personal opinion, not the opinion of the organization I’m here supporting).

    NotAnArdvark

  • bitwolf
    link
    fedilink
    438 months ago

    Spoof your user agent as chrome, test that it works with Firefox.

    If it does report a bug.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    User agent switcher has fixed those issues 9/10 times for me.

    I’ve also had times websites like Outlook or Youtube just run faster after lying to them about using Edge/Chrome…

    • @angrymouse
      link
      English
      38 months ago

      How this service works? They try to contact the website owner?

      • @deathmetal27
        link
        48 months ago

        It’s a volunteer undertaking. Basically people volunteer to report, triage and communicate the issues. If any bug is confirmed to be a browser bug or a website bug, then some volunteers will create a ticket on the browser or websites support sites.

        Again there is no guarantee that all issues will get resolved but it’s a good place to see if the issue is widespread.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    18
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The notice means they know about the problem but don’t care enought to fix it, probably because of economic reasons. The only “pressure” you can exert is to try to make them care again, by not using their site and by promoting Firefox to your peers.

  • half coffee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    148 months ago

    My bank did this a few years ago. I bank somewhere else now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    88 months ago

    My favorite situation that happened few times already was when I sent a link to webpage that worked for me in firefox with no problem to someone using chrome and it told them to use chrome.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    68 months ago

    Also email them that they need to support Tor Browser, for users who live in oppressive countries to be able to access their content

  • 7heo
    link
    fedilink
    38 months ago

    Please report the website as broken anyway. If the website is telling you to use another browser, in the scope of Firefox the website is broken. They deserve to know.