The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday let a Republican-backed Texas law take effect allowing state law enforcement authorities to arrest people suspected of crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally, rejecting a request by President Joe Biden’s administration.

The court has a 6-3 conservative majority, and its three liberal justices dissented on Tuesday. The administration had asked the justices to freeze a judicial order allowing the Texas law to take effect while its challenge to the statute proceeds in the lower courts.

The law violates the U.S. Constitution and federal law by interfering with the U.S. government’s power to regulate immigration, the administration has argued.

  • @LEDZeppelin
    link
    778 months ago

    So what stops New York and California from issuing citizenship certificates and work permits to immigrants? After all SCROTUS just accepted immigration can be under state jurisdiction

    • d00phy
      link
      English
      38 months ago

      B/c, SCOTUS would then quickly issue a “non placet” order.

    • @afraid_of_zombies
      link
      28 months ago

      I am sure the Pope has already thought of a way around that in his ruling.

          • @takenaps
            link
            148 months ago

            I think they may be referring to Texas governor Abbott sending migrants on buses to DC a few times over the past year or so

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            98 months ago

            Well in the above scenario NY and CA still aren’t shipping them to other states using lies and without telling the receiving state.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Texas and Florida have been using state emergency funds to pay private companies 10000x markup to ship illegal immigrants around the nation for over a year and have not been charged for it. They are lying about jobs to trick migrants into this plot. This falls under the terms for human trafficking.

        So no, it’s perfectly legal for a state to move migrants around. Especially if you are not coercing them.

    • @stoly
      link
      198 months ago

      I’m sad to say that we had roughly 50 years of sensible judges. This is SCOTUS gone back to normal.

      • Omega
        link
        228 months ago

        They have repeatedly deemed that states can overrule the federal government when it’s the federal government’s jurisdiction. They have repeatedly deemed the constitution is not enforceable. They have deemed that if they can argue vagueness in wording, it is either all encompassing or entirely non-binding based on the political leanings of issue. They have taken null cases with hypothetical damages in order to make rulings. The 3 Trump appointees deemed Roe v Wade settled law before overturning it.

          • @Maggoty
            link
            88 months ago

            Okay. You’re not a citizen anymore. And you no longer have any rights.

            See why rights have to extend to everyone within our borders now?

              • @Maggoty
                link
                3
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Nope. Big government over there says you’re here illegally now. The guys with guns will be along anytime now to enforce your deportation. If you resist you’re going to be arrested and sentenced to work in the factory for no pay for several years and then dumped in Mexico.

          • @theherk
            link
            78 months ago

            To say nothing of RvW, do you really think the constitution doesn’t provide some rights beyond citizens? For context, check out the preamble to the Declaration of Independence. More importantly, you won’t find this delineation in the Bill of Rights. Immigrants are granted due process, as written in the 14th as “any person”. There are many protections granted to all, precisely because we believed all are equal. This is well established constitutional law.

              • @theherk
                link
                108 months ago

                No. Everybody. Full stop.

                • @[email protected]OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  68 months ago

                  It never ceases to amaze me how citizens of a nation can be so utterly wrong about what’s in their own constitution and bill of rights.

                  And I say this as a Canadian, because we’ve got Canadians quoting the Second Amendment like it’s law up here.

                  sigh

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                38 months ago

                Hang on, hang on, I think you missed it. It applies to “ALL PERSONS.” You’ll note that it does not include “unless you’re an illegal immigrant.”

          • Omega
            link
            18 months ago

            Funny, I didn’t even comment on immigrant rights or the validity of RvW.

  • no banana
    link
    178 months ago

    Isn’t this just gonna effectively move the federal border outside of Texas in terms of migration?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    168 months ago

    Thankfully, some cities have already come out and said they won’t enforce the law. It’s just a lawsuit away from bankrupting some of the bordertowns.

  • @Madison420
    link
    158 months ago

    If immigration is a state issue then I recognize Texas as an adversarial state and their citizens illegal immigrants, about half of my state would have to go back to Texas. So much Texas pride in the Midwest and not one single one of those fucks wants to go back because they know it’s a dystopian shit hole only barely supported by a port that is economically necessary for the nation.

    • @Maggoty
      link
      48 months ago

      Almost like it’s larger than any single state…

      • @Harvey656
        link
        -48 months ago

        Second largest state. Alaska is bigger.

        • @Maggoty
          link
          28 months ago

          Border security? Huge issue?

          You really missed that reference?