• @jaybirrd
    link
    English
    291 year ago

    Anytime I see an announcement about voting on a bill that seems even remotely desirable, I just assume it won’t pass. I’m basically always right and it saves some grief.

    • @SinningStromgald
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Or a watered down useless/pointless version of it will pass where the consequences might as well be non-existent.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        And they’re full of riders that have nothing to do with the title or spirit of the bill and invent new ways to fuck over the working class.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Like condemning dragons that kidnap princesses. Ok, that’s exaggerated bullshit, but I can’t remember what they actually did condemn in the past year or so that was made-up nonsense. It was meaningless.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      That cynicism is acceptable for the Senate.

      The venn diagram for legislation that gets 50 democrats on board and 10 republicans is razor thin. They can barely keep up with essential shit like not defaulting in order to prevent a catastrophic global economic meltdown. The literal bare minimum is now what we look to for an example of bipartisanship.

  • rebul
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    I find it hilarious that members of Congress are pretending to be operating from a morally superior position vs the judicial branch.

    • @gAlienLifeform
      link
      121 year ago

      I mean, it is a democratically superior position. If it takes a bunch of hypocritical assholes who are one or two betrayals await from being indicted at all times to get Thomas, Roberts, Alito, Kavanaugh and the rest in a jail cell where they belong I’ll take it.