"In a ruling submitted today, Judge Corley said the following:

Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision has been described as the largest in tech history. It deserves scrutiny. That scrutiny has paid off: Microsoft has committed in writing, in public, and in court to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation for 10 years on parity with Xbox. It made an agreement with Nintendo to bring Call of Duty to Switch. And it entered several agreements to for the first time bring Activision’s content to several cloud gaming services. This Court’s responsibility in this case is narrow. It is to decide if, notwithstanding these current circumstances, the merger should be halted—perhaps even terminated—pending resolution of the FTC administrative action. For the reasons explained, the Court finds the FTC has not shown a likelihood it will prevail on its claim this particular vertical merger in this specific industry may substantially lessen competition. To the contrary, the record evidence points to more consumer access to Call of Duty and other Activision content. The motion for a preliminary injunction is therefore DENIED. "

  • @lp0101
    link
    English
    1301 year ago

    This is really a tough one. I hate consolidation, but I also really hate Bobby Kottick.

        • Goronmon
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          Yeah, in no version of how this played out was he going to not receive hundreds of millions of dollars. That was never an option.

      • @Reamen
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        I don’t care how much he gets as long as he isn’t in charge anymore.

    • @LetMeEatCake
      link
      English
      311 year ago

      Kotick gets rewarded by the deal going through. Billions of dollars from the sale. Worst case for him after that is a few hundred million from a golden parachute if he’s fired. We have no real reason to think he will (or won’t, to be clear) be fired though, so there’s a very real chance this is full reward for him: giant piles of money and continues to get to run Activision-Blizzard, just with Microsoft bosses above him.

      The deal going through isn’t something you want if you hate him.

      • @lp0101
        link
        English
        231 year ago

        He was filthy rich anyway, a few hundred million more doesn’t make any difference. If the deal gets him out, then that’s still a small win, despite Microsoft owning even more developers

      • @Reamen
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        The only reason I’m for the merger is that I know how much Microsoft can affect a corporations executive structure. I would hope they are already planning to replace him already, but either way he won’t last when he gets tossed into MS’ culture.

        At least, that is what I’m hopping.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Is there any news what will happen to him? Usually on buy out like this, the previous CEO will be appointed as VP or other executive in parent company

    • @LostMyRedditLogin
      link
      English
      -91 year ago

      At least Kotick is capable of making good game franchises before killing them with endless sequels. Microsoft is completely incompetent at making games unless it’s a driving sim. This is the final nail in Bliizard’s coffin. Bye bye Warcraft, StarCraft, and Diablo.

      • @nostalgicgamerz
        link
        English
        151 year ago

        It potentially could have opposite effect. Spencer said that one of the IPs he wanted to revive was StarCraft

      • @NOT_RICK
        link
        English
        81 year ago

        Microsoft is completely incompetent at making games

        I mean, AoE was pretty awesome

        • @Reamen
          link
          English
          8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think that’s the point of the Xbox Game Studios. They purchase a bunch of existing games studios with good talent and let them mostly manage themselves and their own games direction.

          MS doesn’t want full control anyway because yeah, they aren’t great at it. They just want to buy enough companies that they get the money from the good games. Then they’ll pull the good talent out of the shitty studios and shut them down.

        • @Methylman
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          I remember once upon a time browsing the Microsoft game studios site and getting excited for the upcoming RTS releases

      • @Reamen
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        I don’t think Kotick was really in the picture when all their game franchises were being created. The only thing he’s good at is acquiring already successful games and companies and then squeezing everything he can out of them before they turn to shit.

        • @LostMyRedditLogin
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          He made Call of Duty from the ashes of Medal of Honor Allied Assault by helping form the studio Infinity Ward. He wisely bought Guitar Hero from a small device manufacturer. Under his watch Tony Hawk and Spyro made several hundred millions before he ran them into the ground. I hate his guts, but I’m not going to deny his business acumen. There’s a chance MS doesn’t even replace him and he can go further into MS executive suite.

          • @jwagner7813
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            He’s a POS in the industry. He’s great at finding good products, or even diamonds in the rough, and absolutely destroying them in some way. Usually in the form of MTX or some other abhorrent method that us gamers tend to hate.

            I don’t think anyone denies his ability to find great software, it’s what he does after it that everyone hates.

  • @giantofthenorth
    link
    English
    871 year ago

    What’s the point of all these lawsuits over mergers when every single time there is clearly a monopolistic merger it just goes through anyways.

    • Goronmon
      link
      fedilink
      43
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The issue in this instance is that’s its hard to prove that a company not even close to leading to the market is going to somehow dominate that market through a single (albeit large) acquisition.

      • donuts
        link
        fedilink
        601 year ago

        It’s not a “single” acquisition though. Microsoft have been acquiring huge companies (Bethesda, for example), hit games (Minecraft), and key development parters from competition (remember Rare?) from the beginning of Xbox.

        To think that they spent all of those billions of dollars to buy out everything but that they aren’t going to use that to benefit their platforms, is just crazy to me.

        Just like they said in one of their internal emails, they are in a unique position to spend their competition out of business, and the entire industry will be worse for it.

        • Goronmon
          link
          fedilink
          211 year ago

          Microsoft have been acquiring huge companies (Bethesda, for example), hit games (Minecraft), and key development parters from competition (remember Rare?) from the beginning of Xbox.

          And yet, they are still in third place in the gaming market behind Sony and Nintendo. If those acquisitions didn’t turn Microsoft into a monopoly already, what will be significantly different if they acquire AVB?

          • donuts
            link
            fedilink
            321 year ago

            They’re 3rd place this generation mainly because they release one big exclusive per year, like Redfall, which turns out to be utter dogshit. It’s not because they don’t have an actual treasure trove of IP to draw from or a lack of development resources.

            While Nintendo is putting out games like Tears of the Kingdom, Microsoft produces boring, samey, minorly iterative crap year after year. Halo and Gears went from being Xbox icons to unsurprising announcements at formulaic E3 press conferences, because Microsoft only seems to know how to beat dead horses.

            Let me ask you this simple question: how have gamers or the industry benefited from Microsoft’s past acquisitions?

            I can’t see any way that allowing Microsoft to own (and probably squander) an ever-growing library of IP is good for me or anyone outside of the company.

            • @diskape
              link
              English
              121 year ago

              Gamers benefited tremendously. GamePass is a game changer and having access to day 1 first (and often 3rd) party releases is amazing. Devs are happy too. Many publicly admitted that without GP some of their games would not launch at all.

              While you are right that MS has released mostly duds this generation, it’s not fair to paint them as completely without any benefits to gamers or industry.

              • @saucyloggins
                link
                English
                251 year ago

                Yeah, gamers will definitely benefit greatly when GamePass becomes the only way to access certain new releases and they start upping the monthly price. This is every service subscription ever. Once they have the market lead they’ll be free to up price, offer shittier service etc.

                • @NOT_RICK
                  link
                  English
                  51 year ago

                  when GamePass becomes the only way to access certain new releases

                  Microsoft has shown no indication that they want to move away from selling games. Shit, they started releasing games on Steam after they spun up gamepass. Seems to me they’ll take your money however you want to hand it to them be it a “rental” or flat out buying it.

              • donuts
                link
                fedilink
                211 year ago

                I know people like GamePass, but I’m not sure that spending $17/mo to own nothing in the end is what I consider a win… Especially since GamePass feels like a prime example of Microsoft digging into their deep company pockets to outspend their competition with what seems to be an unsustainable loss-leader.

                I also have no idea whether it benefits or hurts 3rd party developers.

              • @LetMeEatCake
                link
                English
                51 year ago

                Gamepass as it currently exists will be gone within a decade. This is the Netflix or Amazon model at play. Run service cheaply until it hits critical mass, then start ramping the price up to turn it profitable. You won’t be getting unlimited $70 games on launch for $15/month for forever.

                Even if the above is wrong: a successful GP will fundamentally alter the way games are made. Content is aggressively and constantly tweaked or changed structurally in order to optimize profit. You know why search results on Google are garbage? Because people found a way to take advantage of that system to make the most money; doing so pushed out the good results. Same reason why all the biggest youtube channels have the content creator making a stupid face in the thumbnail with a clickbait title. Same reason why film has moved towards cinematic universes lately, or why so many IPs have moved towards the TV format (its for streaming).

                Consumer oriented content changes when the revenue model changes. If GP is influential enough, games will change to optimize for whatever method makes the most money there — and that model will not be the one that exists currently. If Microsoft pays them by hours of playtime, games will become bloated with more and more empty content or arbitrary difficulty. If DLC continues to not be included, more and more core game content will shift towards DLC that becomes more expensive. Etc.

                Cementing Gamepass is anything but a “tremendous” benefit for gamers.

                • Kite
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  @LetMeEatCake @diskape Everything you said sounds about right. I have a hard time believing it would work out that way in reality though. MS would for sure pull that but would people tolerate it? Most of the scummy stuff I see people tolerate comes from games and companies that they previously enjoyed before microtransactions or degrading quality. If MS just ups gamepass to 25 or something a month, I think people would just not buy it.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Game Pass is already profitable, as said by Phil Spencer.

                  The goal with game pass is to have enough subscribers giving guaranteed revenue to finance all their first party games for the year along with the payouts for third party games. Once a person is subscribed and in the ecosystem, Microsoft then get 30% of every third party game and DLC they buy. That’s where the real money is. Game Pass is there to get them hooked. With MS’s goals of 4 AAA first party games a year, they need say $400-$600mil in revenue from game pass a year for that. They’re already over half the number of subscriptions needed for the upper end of that revenue @$15/month. Adding COD will make that number explode.

                • @diskape
                  link
                  English
                  -11 year ago

                  That’s a lot of negative “what ifs”. We can only judge by current situation not by what something may or may not become in the future. This is not Minority Report video games edition.

                  Shift towards DLC and worst, season passes and micro transactions, already happened without GP. We live in that world. GP here is not to blame.

                  No matter how you slice it - right now GP is tremendous value for gamers. It finally forced competitors to introduce some form of their own subscription service. Sony/Nintendo fans like them, and without GP these services would not exist.

                  I’m lucky to have 3 main consoles and PC. In order of money spend per game its highest PS5 > Switch > PC > XSX lowest. Exact reverse order is # of games played on given platform. I spend less for GP than for Netflix and get way more entertainment out of it. The other consoles are just for very expensive exclusives.

                  GP model allows me to find and try games that I normally wouldn’t buy. Forza Horizon 5, Immortality or Pentiment are just 3 examples.

              • @TwilightVulpine
                link
                English
                31 year ago

                Studios don’t need to be owned by Microsoft for games to be on GamePass.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            In one specific hardware ranking. Consoles sales don’t quantify market dominance. Game sales do. And with these recent acquisitions msft will be dominating game sales.

        • @TheAndrewBrown
          link
          English
          151 year ago

          Theoretically, the way it works is each one of those sales should go through until you hit the one that would push them over the edge to monopoly. You don’t block a purchase because of purchases you expect them to make in the future (unless stuff has already been signed)

    • @echoplex21
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      Well the good thing here is that there was several concessions MS has made in contracts to ensure it’s mitigated. That’s why it’s necessary to go through the trial even if it isn’t likely going to be in your favor. Small victories

    • @Foggyfroggy
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      So that you think rich people have rules. Justice theater

  • QubaXR
    link
    English
    631 year ago

    Oh great, more consolidation and monopoly building.

    • Grimr0c
      link
      English
      541 year ago

      'Tis the era of Indy Games, my friend. Abandon the Graphically amazing games that cannot be built upon passion due to have dev teams of 10,000 strong. Instead, embrace the smaller titles developed by less than 10 people whom cry with joy at the prospect of showering you with entertainment and art.

      • @SCB
        link
        English
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re saying this 3 weeks before BG3 drops lol

        This is the best year for big studios in a loooong time

        • @sorenant
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          Just don’t buy it or wait a couple years to grab it at good discount. Or if you’re feeling extra feisty, take the high seas.

          • @SCB
            link
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’ve already purchased BG3, and Larian is one of very few companies I will pre-order anything from solely due to my desire to contribute to them making more games.

            The genuine love they demonstrated during D:OS 1/2 has me sold on their development style as basically “the old Blizzard” and until that changes, I will donate to kickstarters, preorder games, whole 9 yards. Making the D:OS Enhanced editions free, separate installs, with the amount of additions and quality they added, was just next-level for a game company.

            Their community engagement and response during the BG3 Early Access only cemented this belief for me.

            The more companies we get like Larian working on different genres, the better the gaming industry would be.

            • @sorenant
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I was talking more about the big studio releases in general. I also recommend keeping an eye on the studio if you love them that much, it’s not uncommon for core devs responsible for making a studio great in the first place quitting and leaving behind an empty shell.

              Or worse, they find a more profitable franchise and turns your favorite one into a side project. Looking at you, From.

              • @SCB
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                I think you should watch any Panel From Hell about BG3 and see firsthand just how unfounded these fears are with Larian.

                Also I don’t really get the distaste for From? They just made Elden Ring, arguably one of the greatest games of all time. Their AC game is gonna be lit AF.

                • @sorenant
                  link
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  I don’t hate From, I just don’t care for souls-like and so I’ve been starved for AC games for years. Hopefully the mechanics from souls won’t seep into AC.

          • @SCB
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            I’ve got money to spare and I’m quite confident in my spending choices.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Facts, battlebit remastered is going to go down as one of the best releases of the year, and I think it was developed by just 3 people

      • @PROblem
        link
        English
        41 year ago
        1. By Steam Deck
        2. Stop buying AAA games
        3. Subscribe to Humble Choice
        4. Enjoy gaming again
      • @Teodomo
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        What are some good venues to discover indie games? I’ve been checking YT channels like Wanderbots and Splattercatgaming and the only subreddit I still go back to is GameDeals but I’m sure there’s a lot of places to get to know about new and old indies of specific genres

  • donuts
    link
    fedilink
    461 year ago

    As much as I hate Activision Blizzard as a publisher and Bobby Kotick as a person, I feel this level of corporate consolidation is a terrible thing for the games industry and gamers.

    There is so much more to this than CoD being on Playstation or not…

  • 𝐘Ⓞz҉
    link
    English
    361 year ago

    Break Microsoft, Meta and Google. They will kill humanity

  • @oryx
    link
    English
    331 year ago

    I don’t care about “monopolies” and “consolidation”

    I just care about the possibility of Guitar Hero being revived god dammit

    • @woodenskewer
      link
      English
      121 year ago

      Clone hero is fun.

      I gave up on guitar hero after they implemented the greedy “tokens” model on GH: Live. It was very lame. You had to play a radio station of sorts to get tokens. Tokens could be used to play a song of your choice. When you ran out you had to play the radio station or buy more with real money lol.

      • @oryx
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        I love CH. Haven’t played in years though.

        GH:TV was super cool though in my opinion, but yeah the token stuff was dumb. I spent a lot of time just jamming to music videos. That’s basically all I did in Love lol

      • VindictiveJudge
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Does Clone Hero have the character customization thing? It’s totally pointless, but I enjoyed having my custom band on the stage.

        • @woodenskewer
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          I’m not sure, I played with a bland black background and just had the note highway. There are backgrounds you can add in but you have to tinker to do it

    • @PutangInaMo
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      The only games I ever sold my soul for were eudemon online, guitar hero, for a short while destiny, and stardew valley.

      I have been bored with most games that have came out throughout the timeline but guitar hero holds a special place in my heart and I would absolutely love to have a new one come out.

      We tried the band one a while back and it just didn’t hit the same.

      • @weedazz
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        I too became addicted to destiny during beyond light and witch queen. I finally kicked the habit before lightfall. Based on the reviews, looks like we made the right choice !

        • @PutangInaMo
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Looks like we did! Good times though.

  • @echoplex21
    link
    English
    271 year ago

    I know a lot of people (rightfully) are against it . But the way Activision/Blizzard has been run has been shambles and needs at least some kind of change. Plus the scrutiny has lead to several concessions by MS that will help curtail future antitrust issues for the most part.

    • @LetMeEatCake
      link
      English
      211 year ago

      They’re run more effectively than Microsoft has run their gaming division for the past ~15 years or so… Microsoft’s gaming leadership has seen one of the most valuable gaming IPs, Halo, flounder again and again and again. They closed all their game studios and spent a whole generation with minimal first party exclusives, they did I don’t know how much damage to Arkane with Redfall…

      More generally, Microsoft’s approach to leading their game studios is to leave them to run the way the studio was ran pre-acquisition. Activision-Blizzard is not going to see major changes to the way they run if this deal does go through (pending CMA). Microsoft will Activision to be run the way it is now, and only intervene if profits dip too much (considering Halo, though, that might take quite the dip).

      I don’t get the assumption that Activision is going to see some major cleanup from this. They won’t.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        they did I don’t know how much damage to Arkane with Redfall…

        Microsoft aren’t to blame for Redfall. Redfall started development in 2018 but Microsoft didn’t buy them til 2021. Redfall sucks because Arkane Austin made a bad game without any input from MS.

        Microsoft didn’t close all their studios either. In fact they’ve barely closed any actual studios that have made xbox games. They closed ones that were bad though. Lionhead closed because Fable Legends was bad. I was in the beta, and it was not a good game. It would have absolutely flopped and killed the studio. They closed Ensemble almost 15 years ago. That’s about it really.

        • @sorenant
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Devs can do no wrong, it’s always the publishers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Well at least it’s gonna clean up the really horrible practices at Activision Blizzard with all the SA allegations. MS is infinitely better for the workers than ABK.

        • @LetMeEatCake
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          That only happens if Microsoft cleans house, which hasn’t been their MO yet. It could happen. It’s just not certain to happen. There’s no real reason to predict it will or will not happen in either direction.

          • @echoplex21
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            You’re right , MS has been very hands off with their studios since Bungie (they may have overcorrected a little too much). But I think there’s been dialogue of this changing especially after the Redfall dev cycle (very surprised Bethesda forced Arkane into such a departure from their regular MO). This will be very necessary especially with ABK.

            • @LetMeEatCake
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              I haven’t seen anything from Microsoft to indicate this. What did you see from them that makes you think that?

              • @echoplex21
                link
                English
                41 year ago

                The biggest sign was the upheaval of 343 leadership recently. Finally being rid of Bonnie Ross will do wonders for the team hopefully. I believe I’ve seen Matt Booty ( what a name) mention how they’ve given more power to the team who came in and fixed MCC. Plus they’ve recently mentioned how other dev studios might also get involved with the franchise.

                found it

                Plus they’ve recently changed the team responsible for Perfect Dark as well. Hopefully it’s a sign of things to come (who would have thought people would be WANTING them to become more hands on).

      • @echoplex21
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hmm are they ? Yes 343 has been meh. But I’ve enjoyed the new Gears games, Forza hasn’t missed a step, Psychonauts may have been my GOTY, Ori has become one of my favorite series’s of all time, HiFi Rush was a surprise hit as well as Pentiment. Also the issue with Arkane was Bethesda mandating them to make it a GaaS before their acquisition with MS; other wise they were hands off (which they’ve done to a fault).

        Meanwhile ATVI recently has been Sekiro and Diablo? I’m probably forgetting some games for sure. And let’s not forget all the SA that have run rampant at that company unfortunately :(

        I think after recent developments and from how MS has been changing their tune, it feels they’ve learnt from their extreme hands off position. At least I hope so. Hopefully they get to that perfect middle ground that Sony has achieved

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      On games side, ActiBlizz is much better than MS. I’m more concerned if they instead become like other MS studio, releasing games every few years and forgotten immediately

      • @Reamen
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s a bit of a massive overgeneralization. The list of games studios under MS is pretty large now and a lot of them make great games:

        343 Industries The Coalition Compulsion Games Double Fine Productions The Initiative inXile Entertainment Mojang Studios Ninja Theory Obsidian Entertainment Playground Games Rare Turn 10 Studios Undead Labs World’s Edge Xbox Game Studios Publishing Bethesda Softworks Alpha Dog Games Arkane Studios id Software MachineGames Roundhouse Studios Tango Gameworks ZeniMax Online Studios

        The thing is, MS is usually hands off for a few years after they acquire a company. Game launches can be hit and miss based on how good the individual studios are. I don’t think just because they’re owned by MS is a good indicator of whether or not they make good games.

        I wouldn’t expect Activision/Blizzard to change much. They’re a huge company. The only good thing would be maybe getting rid of Bobby Kotick

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Based on the track record, they might not be the ones to whip Activision/Blizzard in to shape.

      Honestly, I have my doubts that even call of duty will survive this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    While I absolutely hate the fact that the gaming industry is being consolidated into a few massive corps, I am very excited for the entire Activision Blizzard umbrella to be under new leadership.

  • GreenAlex
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    It’s amazing to me how short-sighted this decision is. Yeah sure keep wide access to CoD for 10 years to get the FTC off their back and then watch all that fall away immediately after. For us this is potentially decent gains in the short term but certainly contributes to this industry turning to crap long term.

    • Ready! Player 31
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      potentially decent gains in the short term but certainly contributes to this industry turning to crap long term.

      Hmm where have I seen that before

    • @Shadywack
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      What’s really nice is that the big studio games are shit anyways, they’ve made it easy to enjoy life without feeling like you’re missing out on some dumb crappy games that rip you off.

  • Drewsipher
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 year ago

    I hate this consolidation of the gaming market but Microsoft seems to not have sex pest as direct bosses so that’s a good thing… makes me feel less scummy if I buy d4

    • @seejur
      link
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wait until they set Edge as the default browser every time you start one of their games

        • @garretble
          link
          English
          71 year ago

          I feel like the “Edge is bad” stereotype is the new “Apple only has a one button mouse.”

          People were still making fun of that years after it was no longer the case.

          • @seejur
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t have anything personally against Edge as a browser. But what irks me to no end are all the way Microsoft tries to shove it down your throat. I will never use Edge for that reason only, even if it were to become the best browser by a mile.

            • Drewsipher
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              That’s completely fair. I use Windows and I do end user support so it just makes sense to me to live in the environment that my users do. They use chrome and edge so I just keep edge as my default because it’s usable and it lets me just be bare bones and always have the most up to date knowledge on one of the pieces of software that’s there

          • Drewsipher
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I mean I used chrome before and they both use the same underlying bits and since I use it by default 1)as end user support I can always have in my back pocket knowing the defaults by heart 2)it doesn’t bug me. The usability is the same so… unless I wanted to switch to Firefox it’s the best option and Firefox is so wildly different from what my user base where I work uses there’s no point I’d rather be in the environment they are in…. If edge was as bad as IE then yeah I’d not use it but it works

      • Drewsipher
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I mean could that happen? Sure. But the people that where most at fault would be redundant at Microsoft so they will get paid to go away. Half the reason this started was because of the bullshit coming out about Bobby and the boys

    • donuts
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Be honest, you bought D4 anyway, didn’t you?

      • Drewsipher
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Nope. I thought bout it but as much as I’d like it because I love a good dopamine hit from an ARPG I just kept playing totk and kept away from blizzard. An SC3 would probably be harder for me if I’m completely honest but so far it is not in my library

  • @colonial
    link
    English
    151 year ago

    Fucking hell. We really need to shatter all these cancerous megacorps.

  • @MrNesser
    link
    English
    131 year ago

    RIP any new blizzard games in the UK

    • @Stovetop
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      UK will probably still get the games, they’ll just go through different publishers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      The CMA agreed to negotiate so I think it’s likely that a deal will be made soon. The UK doesn’t want to be left out

    • @echoplex21
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      I believe the CMA have opened up talks to get further assurances when it passes. Best for both parties.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Hopefully that all gets figured out for those in the UK. It would really suck for those there being locked out of new games.

        • @LetMeEatCake
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          A lot of people speculate that Microsoft would try to work around the UK’s CMA ruling against the merger by not publishing any Activision-Blizzard games in the UK.

          To me that sounds like bullshit that wouldn’t fly, especially since MS has so many of their own offices in the UK and their own critical businesses that could be impacted too. But I’m not a lawyer so take my “that’s bullshit” with a heaping pile of salt. Although I haven’t seen any lawyers speculate the above either, so take that with a similar pile of salt too. But that’s the reasoning behind the statements to that effect.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -31 year ago

        Read the linked article for some good potential reasons it’s an issue (e.g. Microsoft has been doing a lot of layoffs recently, why is her son still employed?)

        But that was written before the ruling. Now that we have it, her ties to Microsoft offer at least one potential explanation to the nonsense of the decision (IMO, obviously).

        For an excellent write up on what happened, check out Matt Stoler’s recent article.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Microsoft has been doing a lot of layoffs recently, why is her son still employed?

          Last article I found said they laid off less than 1% of theor staff. It would be weird if he was layed off.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Lol so the only reason he wasn’t laid off is because of his mum? What are you basing that off?

        • @sorenant
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          I don’t think the son of a FTC judge really depends on his Microsoft job to not go hungry.

  • @Clbull
    link
    English
    101 year ago

    As far as poison goes, I’d much rather pick Phil Spencer over Bobby Kotick.

    • @MeanEYE
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      My thinking exactly. Never though I’d see the day to be happy Microsoft is acquiring some company.

  • @Renacles
    link
    English
    91 year ago

    I’m very torn on this one, Microsoft becoming this big can’t be good but Activision is such a dumpster fire that there is no way this doesn’t help them get their shit together.