Twelve people drowned trying to get to aid dropped by plane off a Gaza beach, Palestinian health authorities have said, amid growing fears of famine nearly six months into Israel’s military campaign.

Video of the airdrop on Monday showed crowds of people running towards the beach, in Beit Lahiya in north Gaza, as crates with parachutes floated down, then people standing deep in water and bodies being pulled on to the sand.

In Washington, the Pentagon said three of the 18 bundles of airdropped aid into Gaza on Monday had parachute malfunctions and fell into the water, but could not confirm if anyone was killed trying to reach the aid.

Archive

  • @Linkerbaan
    link
    English
    18
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    three of the 18 bundles of airdropped aid into Gaza on Monday had parachute malfunctions

    A 17% failure rate on “military equipment” is absolutely disgusting. Why the hell does America keep throwing dodgy projectile bombs on Gaza? At least make sure the stupid parachutes work before throwing them into one of worlds most densely populated areas.

    Or you know, force isael to let in aid trucks.

      • @Linkerbaan
        link
        English
        18 months ago

        You’re right I’ll correct that

    • @HappycamperNZ
      link
      English
      08 months ago

      You are assuming that 17% was total failure, and this equipment is one time use on equipment so not at all invested in reliability. One line snapping is technically a malfunction - compare that to the reusable parachutes that carry people and watch the reliability difference.

      These are also aid packages that get ripped out of the back of a moving aircraft, fall in windy conditions and are then torn apart to be used. Would you rather this or half the number of packages that are now more reliable?

    • Nothing is 100% reliable thats just how engineering and manufacturing work. Reliability is an exponential so is it worth doubling the price to have it be 10% failure instead of 17% they did the math and it would seem not.

      Im sure somone did a risk assesment and green stamped it.

      • @mlg
        link
        English
        58 months ago

        Im sure somone did a risk assesment and green stamped it.

        Yeah except this is the American military industrial complex. That 17% to 1% would have been a 2 cent increase for a parachute they’re probably charging 5k per unit.

        • Sure a better parachute might cost that but the development, testing, aquasition, supply chain bs, quality control, manufacturing proccess, etc etc keeps costing more and more while u make small improvments on reliability. Its more like a half the falure rate can easily cost double the price as i said its exponential 1% is a lot further away cost wise than u might think.

          • @Linkerbaan
            link
            English
            38 months ago

            If it has a 17% failure rate the certification and quality control are pretty worthless.

          • @Nutteman
            link
            English
            08 months ago

            Mmm yes daddy continue to use numbers and corporate brain to justify the US military’s many failures to actually deliver aid (oh, and the people those failures killed)

            • @SkyezOpen
              link
              English
              08 months ago

              I would think you’d be more mad about the US bombs that have killed tens of thousands instead of the few squished by actual aid packages, but here we are.

  • Venia Silente
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48 months ago

    Why don’t they just land the planes on the ground and deliver the aid there, instead of just haphazardly tossing it to the air hoping it 1.- lands somewhere 2.- without killing someone via impact or 3.- landing in a completely different realm and medium?

    • @SkyezOpen
      link
      English
      118 months ago

      Are there any runways in Gaza that are 5000 feet long?

      • Venia Silente
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        I had to go google what a “feet” is, since IIRC it’s a body part (well, plural of) but even with that, what kind of tremendously inefficient aircraft does the mighty US have that can’t brake in 1600 m? If that’s that much of a concern , just land a helicopter, those can do VTOL.

        • @SkyezOpen
          link
          English
          28 months ago

          what kind of tremendously inefficient aircraft does the mighty US have that can’t brake in 1600 m?

          The goddamn C-130 with a load capacity of 3000 stone. I assume you think pounds are currency so I saved you the confusion.

          • Venia Silente
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            Oh no I get the plane and stuff.

            I just expected by this fair point in the good year of 21st century the US would have, dunno, retro rockets on their aircraft or something. Since they spend so much on military.

            • andrew
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 months ago

              They can do JATO for both takeoff and landing but it’s tremendously risky and hard on the airfare so it’s reserved for extreme emergencies where there are no other options, IIRC.

  • @givesomefucks
    link
    English
    -208 months ago

    After Biden’s actions the last 5 months, it’s hard not to think this shit is intentional.

    The bullshit about “can’t stop aid” was at least plausible. But after stopping aid to the victims, it’s just cold heartedness.

    This isn’t just apathy, Biden wants the genocide.