- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Toy company makes request after altered images – which hide suspects’ identities in line with state law – go viral
A southern California police department has been handcuffed by Lego after the toy company asked the agency to stop adding Lego heads to cover the faces of suspects in images it shares on social media.
The Murrieta police department has been using Lego heads and emojis to cover people’s faces in posts on social sites since at least early 2023. But the altered photos went viral last week after the department posted a statement about its policy, prompting several news articles and, later, the request from Lego.
…
Murrieta police had an internal discussion about posting photos of arrestees in general and announced a new department policy on Instagram in January 2023. The community had requested more of their “weekly roundup” posts, so the department said it started using the Lego heads and emojis to comply with the law while still engaging with Murrieta residents.
You must log in or register to comment.
How about we not turn the criminal justice system into a spectacle for the masses?
I always love how baffled podcasters and such are when they report about crimes in other countries where criminals have to be protected from the public (like Germany) and they cannot find mugshots or even a last name.
It’s none of our business, people.
I agree unless we’re talking about sex crimes like rapists and pedophiles. In those cases, I think we absolutely should know exactly who’s been convicted and whether or not they live near my house.
Reporting on something actively being investigated is how innocent people have their lives ruined by the public. There are registries and maps already for convicted rapists/pedophiles.
Yes I know. That’s what I’m referring to.
I disagree even with post-conviction. I think that being “the sex offender” forever will drive people in corners they would otherwise have steered clear of. Most sex crimes are domestic violence cases and are not about evil men succumbing to their overbearing and perverse sex drive. They are about control and power. So forcing a sex offender who has committed such an act and then payed for his crime into the role of the pervert psychopath forever is actually not helping anybody.
Same goes for pedophiles. Should they be hardcore barred from every goddamn child on earth? Abso-fucking-lutely. But I don’t think that exposure is the right tool here. They can be barred from working with children, they can be checked on by police, there is so much one can do to prevent people like them from doing horrible stuff to children. Pushing them onto a corner for what is ultimately a condition they didn’t choose (they did choose to act.on it of course) will just make them the monster they are perceived as, even if they would have managed to get themselves under control had they not been made a pariah for their entire life.
But I get that this is pretty much a cultural thing. I for my part think that it is right that we do not expose people on maps here in Germany.
I can appreciate your point of view and I realize not every “sex crime” is a sicko pedophile. Even a teenager sending a nude photo to their boyfriend/girlfriend can be considered a sex crime in many places. So there are gray areas.
However, I stand by the fact that I would absolutely want to know if my next door neighbor was a rapist, pedophile or producer/collector of child porn. That’s just the father/husband in me being protective of my family.
The father in me also wants to know… Kind of. I only want to know if there is someone that might actually do something. If they don’t do anything to my kid, I don’t think it’s any of my business what this person has done or hasn’t done. That’s for the courts and police to deal with. Since “only tell me when you’re up to no good” is not possible, I actually prefer to not know.
A system whereby authorities check somehow of they have contact to possible victims and only warn those would be ideal, but how would you implement something like that in reality?
You’re talking about post conviction (or at least I hope you are). The discussion is about pre-conviction.
Yes, I am absolutely talking about post conviction.
Cops don’t even see the problem.
“We are currently exploring other methods to continue publishing our content in a way that is engaging and interesting to our followers,” Durrant wrote, declining further comment.
It’s the “engaging and interesting to our followers” part that makes me so mad…
Please bear with us while we make our descent into a dystopian hellscape more marketable and boost Twitter engagement. Don’t forget to smash that like button 👍
I physically shuddered reading that.
Also, nice username.
You’re a police department, not a fucking Instagram model.
* Not directed at you, octopus.
I feel like this is a symptom of Police Chiefs/Sheriffs being elected in the US of A. They need to win a popularity contest to keep their job.
because without bread and circuses the people would start to notice and take action
Next step is running man
But it always has been. (Unfortunately.)
But then how would the news get their endless Florida Man stories?
I hope Lego sues them into oblivion. They won’t, but I can dream.
This would be so easy to show irreparable harm. Using your kids toy likeness on criminal mugshot and police brutality scenes?! One jury I would gladly be a part of.
What law are they breaking?
Intellectual Property laws as they did not (presumably) license the likeness from Lego.
Same reason you can’t put Mario’s face over them. Nintendo will come down on them with the force of a thousand suns.
I think that for copyright you could argue that its for a transformative artistic purpose, and seeing as it doesn’t supplant legos in the market, I don’t think its clear-cut in either way.
I’m not a lawyer but clearly a civil case could be made.
