• @Zoldyck
    link
    381 year ago

    I’m pro-NATO and against all dictators and autocrats. We are not the same.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      Can NATO ever get rid of its own dictators and autocrats? Dunno but it wouldn’t be as bad if it could

      • @Zoldyck
        link
        81 year ago

        That would be amazing and I hope it’ll happen. Unfortunately this will probably take years.

      • @RexRegum
        link
        71 year ago

        Turkey was soooo close, now I’ve lost all hope for them

        I don’t think Hungary will get rid of that fucker anytime soon either

      • Ab_intra
        link
        71 year ago

        There is no process for this.

      • spacesweedkid27
        link
        61 year ago

        Call it democracy, but in reality it’s just lobbyism.

        Especially in Germany and in the US.

      • Ab_intra
        link
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There is no prosses of kicking a country our if that’s what you’re thinking. The only part of the treaties that allow a member to leave is if they leave and give a years notice. But it’s not possible at this time for a vote on kicking a country out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -91 year ago

      No different from a tankie then. They also have excuses for their preferred governments’ atrocities. If you think “dictators and autocrats” are the only evil that exist in the world, I have some bad news for you.

      • @Tar_alcaran
        link
        141 year ago

        Yeah, the suckage of, say, Germany or the Netherlands being less nice to refugees and farm animals is exactly the same as Russia and China actively committing genocide right now.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -11 year ago

          Yeah let’s conveniently forget about the agent orange and the toppling of governments to install dictators

          • @Tar_alcaran
            link
            111 year ago

            I’m not. The both sucked in the past. But let me repeat:

            Russia is committing genocide. Right now. China is committing genocide. Right now.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              My country is a military dictatorship right now at least in part because the US supported the overthrow of the democratically elected leader.

              And just to be clear, I’m not comparing who is “worse”. I understand that a genocide kind of takes the cake there if you really want to have a pissing contest about it. But the OP above you said that they were “pro-NATO”, which in my book means they’re a shit person.

              • @Zoldyck
                link
                41 year ago

                I’m not a shit person, but thanks. Without NATO Europe would have been a huge mess

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  Yeah that was uncalled for my bad, and I do understand what you mean about Europe. But while the US is helping Europe, it’s actively fucking the rest of us over, with European countries’ help. So that’s great for you, but being pro-NATO can only be seen as extremely selfish at best.

  • BlinkerFluid
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    They used to practically run the place, is why they’re seething so damn hard.

    Before the API comedown, the entire All page on most instances was their horseshit.

    Thank you all for freeing us from Reddit (and Mastodon).

  • @SolanumChillEse
    link
    -251 year ago

    When was the last time China invaded anyone? Including China here is a baseless equivocation and basically yellow scare nonsense.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        Tibet, Taiwan, Hong Kong… Vietnam back in the day. Something still going on with India’s border?

    • @RexRegum
      link
      131 year ago
      1. Yellow scare sounds like a very racist term

      2. Nukes

      • @SolanumChillEse
        link
        -101 year ago

        It is a term used to describe racists, yes. Which the vast majority of China fear-mongering is deeply rooted in.

        Nukes are the reason they’re the same? India, Israel, North Korea, and Pakistan also have nukes.

        • @RexRegum
          link
          101 year ago

          Let’s use racism to describe racists? Seems reasonable

          I knew you’d use the “other countries have nukes too” statement. Well, other countries aren’t as hostile as China is, except North Korea, but are you going to tell me it doesn’t get the China treatment? Lol. Israel is basically an extension of NATO at this point, Pakistan isn’t viewed favourably at all and India isn’t particularly hostile

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      1. China is a superpower, nuke-holder
      2. China failed and still fails to condemn russia’s actions and still see russia as their partner.
      3. Communist countries stick together
      4. China is the only superpower not involved with the current war that remains aggressive towards NATO/US
      5. China has now completely took over Hong-Kong
      6. And they’re openly planning to do the same with Taiwan.

      All these 6 combined is why china is worthy being next to russia in this meme.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Let’s not call Russia communist either lol. People who think that communism is still a threat in '23 are stuck in their cold war dystopianism.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Good marketing, like “Democratic People’s Republic of Korea”

            And both in practice something totally else

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Can you name a communist country that is radically different than china?

              Because I can name 20 different democratic countries that are radically different than north korea, in turn not changing the meaning of “democracy”.

              An outlier doesn’t mean the word changed its meaning.

              • @draneceusrex
                link
                41 year ago

                I would argue that China has implemented a one-party fascist system, as the major ideal of communism is the economic side. They have embraced capitalism, be it under the shadow of the authoritarian government, it is capitalism none the less…

                From my understanding, this is different then communist states such as Cuba and North Korea, as the large majority of their means of production are still 100% state owned.

              • @[email protected]OP
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s more like it’s impossible to name how China could be communist. They’d need a revolution or something

                I’d bet it’s not the first on the list to have it’s people take power

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  I’m saying that china + soviet union has defined and continue to define what communism is. It’s a word that’s tainted forever.

                  Just like, for example, Christianity is defined by modern Christians.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Why do you feel the need to defend China? They could have put any powerful country in there really, but there aren’t many left when you have NATO and Russia already

    • Arcturus
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Do we count EEZ encroachments in the Pacific? Only reason why China isn’t as militarily adventurous as Russia right now, is because they know they’re not ready yet. Not really yellow scare nonsense when China itself (Republic of) is concerned about this.

      • @SolanumChillEse
        link
        -51 year ago

        Do we count disputes over territorial waters as the same as war? Are you actually serious with this question?

        The Spratly Islands are China’s Afghanistan?

        • Arcturus
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          It would be a bit more serious if the territories they claimed were Japanese, but they’re not. China’s not going to pick that fight, because they know they won’t win. China has picked regions guarded by nations that have ships such as these guarding their territories.