The encounter between a Rivian driver and uninformed Tesla owner highlights ‘a need for better education and communication within the EV community,’ the Rivian driver says.

  • mox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1107 months ago

    There’s no question that Tesla’s signage and policies should have been made more clear, but the main problem I see here is neither of those things.

    The problem here is the aggressive and hostile Tesla owner, who chose to pick a fight and call the cops rather than communicating, or even just minding his own business.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      697 months ago

      This is really just stereotypical Tesla driver behavior. They are far and above the most entitled drivers in the SF Bay Area.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        97 months ago

        This is really just stereotypical Tesla driver behavior. They are far and above the most entitled drivers.

        FTFY

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    647 months ago

    genuine question: why call the police anyway? say the tesla driver was right and there was no compatibility. what were they thinking the rivian driver is gonna do? worst case scenario is they are gonna realize their mistake and… leave?

    like how is this different from me seeing someone accidentally filling a minivan with diesel and calling the fucken cops about it? i feel there is something more malicious going on here than “a need for education” unless i am missing something.

    • Diplomjodler
      link
      English
      257 months ago

      Just a Tesla bro being territorial.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67 months ago

        reading these comments i didn’t realize there was a whole subculture around teslas and how pervasive and trending toward toxic it was. wild.

        thank ya!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          107 months ago

          It’s a cult. As with most capitalist cults, you’re only accepted if you spend money how they want you to.

    • @warmaster
      link
      English
      57 months ago

      Maybe he thought he would fuck up the charger.

    • @WoahWoah
      link
      English
      -117 months ago

      I think they were just angry because the Rivian isn’t designed for Supercharging and so was parked sideways across two parking spots.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    617 months ago

    Tesla should have changed their signs when they opened up their charging network to other brands.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        77 months ago

        It was actually quite well planned out, opening up the network in stages to see that everything worked as intended before a wide rollout. You can even see in the app which chargers are open to other car brands. This mistake is 100% on the driver, the info is easily available to that person.

        • @postmateDumbass
          link
          English
          57 months ago

          Just don’t expect a software company to keep documentation up to date.

    • Bilb!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      I think the sign in the photo still makes sense if you interpret it as “Don’t park here unless you’re using the Tesla charging station.”

  • El Barto
    link
    50
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    ‘a need for better education and communication within the EV community’

    That Rivian driver is being way too nice about the situation.

    Imagine someone calling the police on you because you bought pepsi instead of coke. It’s not about education and communication. It’s about a fucking asshole doing asshole shit. You can’t reason with people like that. You tell them to fuck off.

    Edit: hm, he was taking two spots. Not exactly his fault, but I can understand 0.00001% more the Tesla driver. Still an asshole, though.

    Edit 2: If I was in a charging station that said “For Ford vehicles only” and I saw a BMW coming in and using it, I’d be more like “How is that possible? Huh. Interesting!” Then I’d mind my fucking business.

    • @ripcord
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The Tesla owner was complaining that he (incorrectly) thought Rivian wasn’t allowed to charge there, not because he was upset someone bought a Rivian at all.

      Also, from the article - am I reading this right? The guy just assumed that the other dude actually called the cops? After he left? There’s no evidence he did?

      • El Barto
        link
        67 months ago

        Yeah, I know that. But why get mad at that, though? Like, if I am in a restaurant that said “For Android users only” and I see an iPhone user being served, why the fuck would I care? I’d be puzzled and intrigued. Not enraged.

        • @ripcord
          link
          English
          17 months ago

          I think it’s more like - you’re looking to charge your phone at an airport. You’re a Samsung user and you bought a contract to be able to use special Samsung-provided kiosks, which used to be an exclusive feature for you.

          As you look for a charger, you see a dude with an iPhone sitting across 2 of the charge stations. (Maybe there’s only a couple other stations free. Idk from the article). You don’t realize that Samsung recently opened the chargers to iPhone users.

          You’re also irritated because it’s been common for people to be assholes and doing things like leaving their phones plugged in and hanging out for hours. Way linger than they need. Or people sitting at the chargers who are just waiting for their planes and not charging at all. So youre sensitive to people you perceived as being assholes and making it harder for Samsung users to use the service they paid for.

          Tesla dude was clearly overreacting, in the wrong, and being a douche. At least, based on this one-sided ragebait article.

          But I was mostly replying to your Coke vs Pepsi article, where you were making it sound like the Tesla guy was mad at the other dude simply for buying a Rivian.

  • BarqsHasBite
    link
    fedilink
    English
    357 months ago

    Ultimately, the Rivian owner’s adapter didn’t work, so he decided to leave and head to a nearby EVGo charger. That’s when the Tesla driver confronted him. Trying to “steer the conversation towards a constructive dialogue only seemed to aggravate him further,” so the Rivian driver got in his car and left. “As I drove away, I saw him angrily talking on the phone, presumably to an unfortunate 9-1-1 operator.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    when a Model Y driver approached him, “demanding to know why I was there,”

    insisted that it was ILLEGAL for me to be there and that he was CALLING THE POLICE! I was taken aback by his extreme reaction," the Rivian driver writes.

    You insulted his pride. 🤣

  • Bezier
    link
    fedilink
    English
    287 months ago

    They had signage saying tesla only, and the car was parked across two spots, so I can believe the owner looked like a massive dick without additional context.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      607 months ago

      The charge ports on non-Teslas, meanwhile, are also in a different spot on the vehicle, meaning they may have to park parallel to a Supercharger, taking up two spots. That’s what happened here; “I had no choice but to park in a way that blocks two stalls,” according to the Rivian driver.

      • @Wrench
        link
        English
        217 months ago

        Yep. Tesla charging cords are stupidly short, and are designed to force tesla drivers to back into the space for charging, so when you have several tesla charging, the esthetics is better and looks like you’re in a dealership with all the cars uniformly facing out.

        I get that there are probably better power delivery perks to a short cord. But this is classic “form over function” design that reeks of Musk.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          It is objectively safer to park like that (charging or not). Most parking lot accidents happens as someone leaves the parking spot. The risk of accidents when leaving the parking spot is significantly reduced compared to parking front first.

          • Turun
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -17 months ago

            Why was that downvoted, it’s true.

            Backing out of a parking spot is comparatively dangerous, because you can’t see if anyone is approaching from the side.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Because the implication is, that Tesla isn’t doing something bad WRT how they designed the stalls? IDK, anything that’s not bashing Tesla directly seems to get down voted here, even if it’s not actually related specifically to Tesla.

      • Bezier
        link
        fedilink
        English
        147 months ago

        Well yeah, that’s the additional context.

      • JohnEdwa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Specifically, they have to park on the next spot to the right of the charger they are using, as the port on a Rivian is on the left front corner and the Tesla cables are really short. This happens basically on any EV that has the port on anywhere else except the left rear corner, or the front right corner.
        Which is most of them, as it seems the standard spot to put it is in front of the drivers (left side) door.

    • Hanrahan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      Calling the police becase somones a dick ? If he double parked at CostCo woukd he have called the cops, or taken a pic and posted in /c/assholedrivers ?

      • Bezier
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        If you’re reading this as me defending the tesla owner calling cops, I’d just like to point out that I’m not.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    237 months ago

    This is an article about a dumb argument between two random people, not to mention the title is misleading anyway (the Rivian driver only assumes cops were called). Why post it here?

    • @mPony
      link
      English
      87 months ago

      Why post it here

      “Everybody’s got to have somebody to look down on Who they can feel better than at any time they please”

      Kris Kristofferson

  • Altima NEO
    link
    fedilink
    English
    177 months ago

    Wow, what a wack job. I wish I had that much free time to worry about petty bullshit.

    Like how could he come to the conclusion that it’s illegal for anything other than a Tesla to charge there? Tesla equipment is private property, owned by a private business. State law doesn’t give a fuck about that.

    • @WoahWoah
      link
      English
      07 months ago

      You just answered your own question lol

  • Ghostalmedia
    link
    English
    87 months ago

    This Telsa owner sounds like the BBQ Becky of EVs.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    67 months ago

    Bro, I was so confused because a supercharger is an alternative to turbo for forced induction.